Spouse Inherited IRA Options

If your spouse passes away and they had either an IRA, 401(k), 403(b), or some other type of employer sponsored retirement account, you will have to determine which distribution option is the right one for you.   There are deadlines that you will need to be aware of, different tax implications based on the option that you choose, forms that need to be completed, and accounts that may need to be established. 

Spouse Distribution Options

As the spouse, if you are listed as primary beneficiary on a retirement account or IRA, you have more options available to you than a non-spouse beneficiary.  Non-spouse beneficiaries that inherited retirement accounts after December 31, 2019 are required to fully distribution the account 10 years following the year that the decedent passed away. But as the spouse of the decedent, you have the following options: 

• Fulling distribute the retirement account with 10 years

• Rollover the balance to an inherited IRA

• Rollover the balance to your own IRA

To determine which option is the right choice, you will need to take the following factors into consideration: 

• Your age

• The age of your spouse

• Will you need to take money from the IRA to supplement your income?

• Taxes

Cash Distributions

We will start with the most basic option which is to take a cash distribution directly from your spouse’s retirement account.    Be very careful with this option.  When you take a cash distribution from a pre-tax retirement account, you will have to pay income tax on the amount that is distributed to you.  For example, if your spouse had $50,000 in a 401(k), and you decide to take the full amount out in the form of a lump sum distribution, the full $50,000 will be counted as taxable income to you in the year that the distribution takes place. It’s like receiving a paycheck from your employer for $50,000 with no taxes taken out.   When you go to file your taxes the following year, a big tax bill will probably be waiting for you.

In most cases, if you need some or all of the cash from a 401(k) account or an IRA, it usually makes more sense to first rollover the entire balance into an inherited IRA, and then take the cash that you need from there.   This strategy gives you more control over the timing of the distributions which may help you to save some money in taxes.  If as the spouse, you need the $50,000, but you really need $30,000 now and $20,000 in 6 months, you can rollover the full $50,000 balance to the inherited IRA, take $30,000 from the IRA this year, and take the additional $20,000 on January 2nd the following year so it spreads the tax liability between two tax years.

10% Early Withdrawal Penalty

Typically, if you are under the age of 59½, and you take a distribution from a retirement account, you incur not only taxes but also a 10% early withdrawal penalty on the amount this is distributed from the account.  This is not the case when you take a cash distribution, as a beneficiary, directly from the decedents retirement account.  You have to report the distribution as taxable income but you do not incur the 10% early withdrawal penalty, regardless of your age. 

IRA Options

Let's move onto the two IRA options that are available to spouse beneficiaries.  The spouse has the decide whether to: 

• Rollover the balance into their own IRA

• Rollover the balance into an inherited IRA

By processing a direct rollover to an IRA in either case, the beneficiary is able to avoid immediate taxation on the balance in the account.  However, it’s very important to understand the difference between these two options because all too often this is where the surviving spouse makes the wrong decision.  In most cases, once this decision is made, it cannot be reversed. 

Spouse IRA vs Inherited IRA

There are some big differences comparing the spouse IRA and inherited IRA option.

There is common misunderstanding of the RMD rules when it comes to inherited IRA’s.  The spouse often assumes that if they select the inherited IRA option, they will be forced to take a required minimum distribution from the account just like non-spouse beneficiaries had to under the old inherited IRA rules prior to the passing of the SECURE Act in 2019. That is not necessarily true.  When the spouses establishes an inherited IRA, a RMD is only required when the deceases spouse would have reached age 70½.  This determination is based on the age that your spouse would have been if they were still alive.  If they are under that “would be” age, the surviving spouse is not required to take an RMD from the inherited IRA for that tax year.

For example, if you are 39 and your spouse passed away last year at the age of 41, if you establish an inherited IRA, you would not be required to take an RMD from your inherited IRA for 29 years which is when your spouse would have turned age 70½.   In the next section, I will explain why this matters.

Surviving Spouse Under The Age of 59½

As the surviving spouse, if you are under that age of 59½, the decision between either establishing an inherited IRA or rolling over the balance into your own IRA is extremely important.  Here’s why .

If you rollover the balance to your own IRA and you need to take a distribution from that account prior to reaching age 59½, you will incur both taxes and the 10% early withdrawal penalty on the amount of the distribution.

But wait…….I thought you said the 10% early withdrawal penalty does not apply?

The 10% early withdrawal penalty does not apply for distributions from an “inherited IRA” or for distributions to a beneficiary directly from the decedents retirement account.  However, since you moved the balance into your own IRA,  you have essentially forfeited the ability to avoid the 10% early withdrawal penalty for distributions taken before age 59½.

The Switch Strategy

There is also a little know “switch strategy” for the surviving spouse.  Even if you initially elect to rollover the balance to an inherited IRA to maintain the ability to take penalty free withdrawals prior to age 59½, at any time, you can elect to rollover that inherited IRA balance into your own IRA.

Why would you do this?  If there is a big age gap between you and your spouse, you may decide to transition your inherited IRA to your own IRA prior to age 59½.  Example, let’s assume the age gap between you and your spouse was 15 years.  In the year that you turn age 55, your spouse would have turned age 70½.  If the balance remains in the inherited IRA, as the spouse, you would have to take an RMD for that tax year.   If you do not need the additional income, you can choose to rollover the balance from your inherited IRA to your own IRA and you will avoid the RMD requirement.   However, in doing so, you also lose the ability to take withdrawals from the IRA without the 10% early withdrawal penalty between ages 55 to 59½.  Based on your financial situation, you will have to determine whether or not the “switch strategy” makes sense for you.

The Spousal IRA

So when does it make sense to rollover your spouse’s IRA or retirement account into your own IRA?  There are two scenarios where this may be the right solution:

• The surviving spouse is already age 59½ or older

• The surviving spouse is under the age of 59½ but they know with 100% certainty that they will not have to access the IRA assets prior to reaching age 59½

If the surviving spouse is already 59½ or older, they do not have to worry about the 10% early withdrawal penalty.

For the second scenarios, even though this may be a valid reason, it begs the question:  “If you are under the age of 59½ and you have the option of changing the inherited IRA to your own IRA at any time, why take the risk?”

As the spouse you can switch from inherited IRA to your own IRA but you are not allowed to switch from your own IRA to an inherited IRA down the road.

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

Big Changes For 401(k) Hardship Distributions

While it probably seems odd that there is a connection between the government passing a budget and your 401(k) plan, this year there was. On February 9, 2018, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 was passed into law which ended the government shutdown by raising the debt ceiling for the next two years. However, also buried in the new law were changes to rules that govern hardship distributions in 401(k) plans.

What Is A Hardship Distribution?

A hardship distribution is an optional distribution feature within a 401(k) plan. In other words, your 401(k) plan may or may not allow them. To answer that question, you will have to reference the plan’s Summary Plan Description (SPD) which should be readily available to plan participants.

If your plan allows hardship distributions, they are one of the few in-service distribution options available to employees that are still working for the company. There are traditional in-service distributions which allow employees to take all or a portion of their account balance after reaching the age 59½. By contrast, hardship distributions are for employees that have experienced a “financial hardship”, are still employed by the company, and they are typically under the age of 59½.

Meeting The "Hardship" Requirement

First, you have to determine if your financial need qualifies as a "hardship". They typically include:

• Unreimbursed medical expenses for you, your spouse, or dependents

• Purchase of an employee's principal residence

• Payment of college tuition and relative education costs such as room and board for the next 12 months for you, your spouse, dependents, or children who are no longer dependents.

• Payment necessary to prevent eviction of you from your home, or foreclosure on the mortgage of your primary residence

• For funeral expenses

• Certain expenses for the repair of damage to the employee's principal residence

Second, there are rules that govern how much you can take out of the plan in the form of a hardship distribution and restrictions that are put in place after the hardship distribution is taken. Below is a list of the rules under the current law:

• The withdrawal must not exceed the amount needed by you

• You must first obtain all other distribution and loan options available in the plan

• You cannot contribute to the 401(k) plan for six months following the withdrawal

• Growth and investment gains are not eligible for distribution from specific sources

Changes To The Rules Starting In 2019

Plan sponsors need to be aware that starting in 2019 some of the rules surrounding hardship distributions are going to change in conjunction with the passing of the Budget Act of 2018. The reasons for taking a hardship distribution did not change. However, there were changes made to the rules associated with taking a hardship distribution starting in 2019. More specifically, of the four rules listed above, only one will remain.

No More "6 Month Rule"

The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 eliminated the rule that prevents employees from making 401(k) contributions until 6 months after the date the hardship distribution was issued. The purpose of the 6 month wait was to deter employees from taking a hardship distribution. In addition, for employees that had to take a hardship it was a silent way of implying that “if things are bad enough financially that you have to take a distribution from your retirement account, you probably should not be making contributions to your 401(k) plan for the next few months.”

However, for employees that are covered by a 401(k) plan that offers an employer matching contribution, not being able to defer in the plan for 6 months also meant no employer matching contribution during that 6 month probationary period. Starting in 2019, employees will no longer have to worry about that limitation.

Loan First Rule Eliminated

Under the current 401(k) rules, if loans are available in the 401(k) plan, the plan participant was required to take the maximum loan amount before qualifying for a hardship distribution. That is no longer a requirement under the new law.

We are actually happy to see this requirement go away. It never really made sense to us. If you have an employee, who’s primary residence is going into foreclosure, why would you make them take a loan which then requires loan payments to be made via deductions from their paycheck? Doesn’t that put them in a worse financial position? Most of the time when a plan participant qualifies for a hardship, they need the money as soon as possible and having to go through the loan process first can delay the receipt of the money needed to remedy their financial hardship.

Earnings Are Now On The Table

Under the current 401(k) rules, if an employee requests a hardship distribution, the portion of their elective deferral source attributed to investment earnings was not eligible for withdrawal. Effective 2019, that rule has also changed. Both contributions and earnings will be eligible for a hardship withdrawal.

Still A Last Resort

We often refer to hardship distributions as the “option of last resort”. This is due to the taxes and penalties that are incurred in conjunction with hardship distributions. Unlike a 401(k) loan which does not trigger immediate taxation, hardship distributions are a taxable event. To make matters worse, if you are under the age of 59½, you are also subject to the 10% early withdrawal penalty.

For example, if you are under the age of 59½ and you take a $20,000 hardship distribution to make the down payment on a house, you will incur taxes and the 10% penalty on the $20,000 withdrawal. Let’s assume you are in the 24% federal tax bracket and 7% state tax bracket. That $20,000 distribution just cost you $8,200 in taxes.

Gross Distribution: $20,000

Fed Tax (24%): ($4,800)

State Tax (7%): ($1,400)

10% Penalty: ($2,000)

Net Amount: $11,800

There is also an opportunity cost for taking that money out of your retirement account. For example, let’s assume you are 30 years old and plan to retire at age 65. If you assume an 8% annual rate of return on your 401(K) investment that $20,000 really cost you $295,707. That’s what the $20,000 would have been worth, 35 years from now, compounded at 8% per year.

Plan Amendment Required

These changes to the hardship distribution rule will not be automatic. The plan sponsor of the 401(k) will need to amend the plan document to adopt these new rules otherwise the old hardship distribution rules will still apply. We recommend that companies reach out to their 401(k) providers to determine whether or not amending the plan to adopt the new hardship distribution rules makes sense for the company and your employees.

About Michael.........

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

The Procedures For Splitting Retirement Accounts In A Divorce

If you are going through a divorce and you or your spouse have retirement accounts, the processes for splitting the retirement accounts will vary depending on what type of retirement accounts are involved.

401(k) & 403(b) Plan

The first category of retirement plans are called ?employer sponsored qualified plans?. This category includes 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, 457 plans, and profit sharing plans. Once you and your spouse have agreed upon the split amount of the retirement plans, one of the attorneys will draft Domestic Relations Order, otherwise known as a QDRO. This document provides instruction to the plans TPA (third party administrator) as to how and when to split the retirement assets between the ex-spouses. Here is the procedures from start to finish:

• One attorney drafts the Domestic Relations Order (?DRO?)

• The attorney for the other spouse reviews and approved the DRO

• The spouse covered by the retirement plan submits it to the TPA for review

• The TPA will review the document and respond with changes that need to be made (if any)

• Attorneys submit the DRO to the judge for signing

• Once the judge has signed the DRO, its now considered a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO)

• The spouse covered by the retirement plan submits the QDRO to the plans TPA for processing

• The TPA splits the retirement account and will often issues distribution forms to the ex-spouse not covered by the plan detailing the distribution options

Step number four is very important. Before the DRO is submitting to the judge for signing, make sure that the TPA, that oversees the plan being split, has had a chance to review the document. Each plan is different and some plans require unique language to be included in the DRO before the retirement account can be split. If the attorneys skip this step, we have seen cases where they go through the entire process, pay the court fees to have the judge sign the QDRO, they submit the QDRO for processing with the TPA, and then the TPA firm rejects the QDRO because it is missing information. The process has to start all over again, wasting time and money.

Pension Plans

Like employer sponsored retirement plans, pension plans are split through the drafting of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). However, unlike 401(k) and 403(b) plans that usually provide the ex-spouse with distribution options as soon as the QDRO is processed, with pension plans the benefit is typically delayed until the spouse covered by the plan is eligible to begin receiving pension payments. A word of caution, pension plans are tricky. There are a lot more issues to address in a QDRO document compared to a 401(k) plan. 401(k) plans are easy. With a 401(k) plan you have a current balance that can be split immediately. Pension plan are a promise to pay a future benefit and a lot can happen between now and the age that the covered spouse begins to collect pension payments. Pension plans can terminate, be frozen, employers can go bankrupt, or the spouse covered by the retirement plan can continue to work past the retirement date.

I would like to specifically address the final option in the paragraph above. In pension plans, typically the ex-spouse is not entitled to a benefit until the spouse covered by the pension plan is eligible to receive benefits. While the pension plan may state that the employee can retire at 65 and start collecting their pension, that does not mean that they will with 100% certainty. We have seen cases where the ex-husband could have retired at age 65 and started collecting his pension benefit but just to prevent his ex-wife from collecting on his benefit decided to delay retirement which in turn delayed the pension payments to his ex-wife. The ex-wife had included those pension payments in her retirement planning but had to keep working because the ex-husband delayed the benefit. Attorneys will often put language in a QDRO that state that whether the employee retires or not, at a given age, the ex-spouse is entitled to turn on her portion of the pension benefit. The attorneys have to work closely with the TPA of the pension plan to make sure the language in the QDRO is exactly what it need to be to reserve that benefit for the ex-spouse.

IRA (Individual Retirement Accounts)

IRA? are usually the easiest of the three categories to split because they do not require a Qualified Domestic Relations Order to separate the accounts. However, each IRA provider may have different documentation requirements to split the IRA accounts. The account owner should reach out to their investment advisor or the custodian of their IRA accounts to determine what documents are needed to split the account. Sometimes it is as easy as a letter of instruction signed by the owner of the IRA detailing the amount of the split and a copy of the signed divorce agreement. While these accounts are easier to split, make sure the procedures set forth by the IRA custodians are followed otherwise it could result in adverse tax consequences and/or early withdrawal penalties.

About Michael??...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

M&A Activity: Make Sure You Address The Seller’s 401(k) Plan

Buying a company is an exciting experience.  However, many companies during a merger or acquisition fail to address the issues surrounding the seller’s retirement plan which can come back to haunt the buyer in a big way.   I completely understand why this happens.  Purchase price, valuations, tax issues, terms, holdbacks, and new employment agreements tend to dominate the conversations throughout the business transaction.   But lurking in the dark, below these main areas of focus, lives the seller’s 401(k) plan.  Welcome to the land of unintended consequences where unexpected liabilities, big dollar outlays, and transition issues live.

Asset Sale or Stock Sale

Whether the transaction is a stock sale or asset sale will greatly influence the series of decisions that the buyer will need to make regarding the seller’s 401(k) plan.  In an asset sale, it is common that employees of the seller’s company are terminated from employment and subsequently “rehired” by the buyer’s company.  With asset sales, as part of the purchase agreement, the seller will often times be required to terminate their retirement plan prior to the closing date.

Terminating the seller’s plan prior to the closing date has a few advantages from both the buyer’s standpoint and from the standpoint of the seller’s employees. Here are the advantages for the buyer:

Advantage 1:  The Seller Is Responsible For Terminating Their Plan

From the buyer’s standpoint, it’s much easier and cost effective to have the seller terminate their own plan.  The seller is the point of contact at the third party administration firm, they are listed as the trustee, they are the signer for the final 5500, and they typically have a good personal relationship with their service providers.  Once the transaction is complete, it can be a headache for the buyer to track down the authorized signers on the seller’s plan to get all of the contact information changed over and allows the buyer’s firm to file the final 5500.

The seller’s “good relationship” with their service providers is key. The seller has to call these companies and let them know that they are losing the plan since the plan is terminating.  There are a lot of steps that need to be completed by those 401(k) service providers after the closing date of the transaction.  If they are dealing with the seller, their “client”, they may be more helpful and accommodating in working through the termination process even though they losing the business. If they get a random call for the “new contact” for the plan, you risk getting put at the bottom of the pile

Part of the termination process involves getting all of the participant balances out of the plan. This includes terminated employees of the seller’s company that may be difficult for the buyer to get in contact with.   It’s typically easier for the seller to coordinate the distribution efforts for the terminated plan.

Advantage 2:  The Buyer Does Not Inherit Liability Issues From The Seller’s Plan

This is typically the main reason why the buyer will require the seller to terminate their plan prior to the closing date.  Employer sponsored retirement plans have a lot of moving parts.  If you take over a seller’s 401(k) plan to make the transition “easier”, you run the risk of inheriting all of the compliance issues associated with their plan. Maybe they forgot to file a 5500 a few years ago, maybe their TPA made a mistake on their year-end testing last year, or maybe they neglected to issues a required notice to their employees knowing that they were going to be selling the company that year.  By having the seller terminate their plan prior to the closing date, the buyer can better protect themselves from unexpected liabilities that could arise down the road from the seller’s 401(k) plan.

Now, let’s transition the conversation over to the advantages for the seller’s employees.

Advantage 1: Distribution Options

A common goal of the successor company is to make the transition for the seller’s employees as positive as possible right out of the gate.  Remember this rule:  “People like options”.  Having the seller terminate their retirement plan prior to the closing date of the transactions gives their employees some options. A plan termination is a “distributable event” meaning the employees have control over what they would like to do with their balance in the seller’s 401(k) plan.  This is also true for the employees that are “rehired” by the buyer.  The employees have the option to:

• Rollover their 401(k) balance in the buyer’s plan (if eligible)

• Rollover their 401(k) balance into a rollover IRA

• Take a cash distribution

• Some combination of options 1, 2, and 3

The employees retain the power of choice.

If instead of terminating the seller’s plan,  what happens if the buyer decides to “merge” the seller’s plan in their 401(k) plan?  With plan mergers, the employees lose all of the distribution options listed above. Since there was not a plan termination, the employees are forced to move their balances into the buyer’s plan.

Advantage 2:  Credit For Service With The Seller’s Company

In many acquisitions, again to keep the new employees happy, the buyer will allow the incoming employee to use their years of service with the seller’s company toward the eligibility requirements in the buyer’s plan.  This prevents the seller’s employees from coming in and having to satisfy the plan’s eligibility requirements as if they were a new employee without any prior service.  If the plan is terminated prior to the closing date of the transaction, the buyer can allow this by making an amendment to their 401(k) plan.

If the plan terminates after the closing date of the transaction, the plan technically belonged to the buyer when the plan terminated.  There is an ERISA rule, called the “successor plan rule”, that states when an employee is covered by a 401(k) plan and the plan terminates, that employee cannot be covered by another 401(k) plan sponsored by the same employer for a period of 12 months following the date of the plan termination.  If it was the buyer’s intent to allow the seller’s employees to use their years of service with the selling company for purposes of satisfy the eligibility requirement in the buyer’s plan, you now have a big issue. Those employees are excluded from participating in the buyer’s plan for a year.  This situation can be a speed bump for building rapport with the seller’s employees.

Loan Issue

If a company allows 401(k) loans and the plan terminates, it puts the employee in a very bad situation. If the employee is unable to come up with the cash to payoff their outstanding loan balance in full, they get taxed and possibly penalized on their outstanding loan balance in the plan.

Example: Jill takes a $30,000 loan from her 401(k) plan in May 2017.  In August 2017, her company Tough Love Inc., announces that it has sold the company to a private equity firm and it will be immediately terminating the plan.  Jill is 40 years old and has a $28,000 outstanding loan balance in the plan.  When the plan terminates, the loan will be processed as an early distribution, not eligible for rollover, and she will have to pay income tax and the 10% early withdrawal penalty on the $28,000 outstanding loan balance. Ouch!!!

From the seller’s standpoint, to soften the tax hit, we have seen companies provide employees with a severance package or final bonus to offset some of the tax hit from the loan distribution.

From the buyer’s standpoint, you can amend the plan to allow employees of the seller’s company to rollover their outstanding 401(k) loan balance into your plan.  While this seems like a great option, proceed with extreme caution.  These “loan rollovers” get complicated very quickly.  There is usually a window of time where the employee’s money is moving over from seller’s 401(k) plan over to the buyer’s 401(k) plan, and during that time period a loan payment may be missed.  This now becomes a compliance issue for the buyer’s plan because you have to work with the employee to make up those missed loan payments.  Otherwise the loan could go into default.

Example, Jill has her outstanding loan and the buyer amends the plan to allow the direct rollover of outstanding loan balances in the seller’s plan.  Payroll stopped from the seller’s company in August, so no loan payments have been made, but the seller’s 401(k) provider did not process the direct rollover until December.  When the loan balance rolls over, if the loan is not “current” as of the quarter end, the buyer’s plan will need to default her loan.

Our advice, handle this outstanding 401(k) loan issue with care.  It can have a large negative impact on the employees. If an employee owes $10,000 to the IRS in taxes and penalties due to a forced loan distribution, they may bring that stress to work with them.

Stock Sale

In a stock sale, the employees do not terminate and then get rehired like in an asset sale.  It’s a “transfer of ownership” as opposed to “a sale followed by a purchase”.  In an asset sale, employees go to sleep one night employed by Company A and then wake up the next morning employed by Company B.  In a stock sale, employees go to sleep employed by Company A, they wake up in the morning still employed by Company A, but ownership of Company A has been transferred to someone else.

With a stock sale, the seller’s plan typically merges into the buyer’s plan, assuming there is enough ownership to make them a “controlled group”.  If there are multiple buyers, the buyers should consult with the TPA of their retirement plans or an ERISA attorney to determine if a controlled group will exist after the transaction is completed.   If there is not enough common ownership to constitute a “controlled group”, the buyer can decide whether to continue to maintain the seller’s 401(k) plan as a standalone plan or create a multiple employer plan.    The basic definition of a “controlled group” is an entity or group of individuals that own 80% or more of another company.

Stock Sales: Do Your Due Diligence!!!

In a stock sale, since the buyer will either be merging the seller’s plan into their own or continuing to maintain the seller’s plan as a standalone, you are inheriting any and all compliance issues associated with that plan.  The seller’s issues become the buyer’s issues the day of the closing.   The buyer should have an ERISA attorney that performs a detailed information request and due diligence on the seller’s 401(k) plan prior the closing date.

Seller Uses A PEO

Last issue.  If the selling company uses a Professional Employer Organization (PEO) for their 401(k) services and the transaction is going to be a stock sale, make sure you get all of the information that you need to complete a mid-year valuation or the merged 5500 for the year PRIOR to the closing date.  We have found that it’s very difficult to get information from PEO firms after the acquisition has been completed.

The Transition Rule

There is some relief provided by ERISA for mergers and acquisitions.  If a control group exists, you have until the end of the year following the year of the acquisition to test the plans together.  This is called the “transition rule”.   However, if the buyer makes “significant” changes to the seller’s plan during the transition period, that may void the ability to delay combined testing.  Unfortunately, there is not clear guidance as to what is considered a “significant change” so the buyer should consult with their TPA firm or ERISA  attorney before making any changes to their own plan or the seller’s plan that could impact the rights, benefits, or features available to the plan participants.

Horror Stories

There are so many real life horror stories out there involving companies that go through the acquisition process without conducting the proper due diligence and transition planning with regard to the seller’s retirement plan.  It never ends well!!  As the buyer, it’s worth the time and the money to make sure your team of advisors have adequately addressed any issues surrounding the seller’s retirement plan prior to the closing date. 

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

Can I Use My 401K or IRA To Buy A House?

The most difficult part of buying a house is coming up with the down payment. This leads to the question, "Can I access cash in my retirement accounts to help toward the down payment on my house?". The short answer is in most cases, "Yes". The next important questions is "Is it a good idea to take a withdrawal from my retirement account for the down payment given all of the taxes and penalties that I would have to pay?" This article aims to answer both of those questions and provide you with withdrawal strategies to help you avoid big tax consequences and early withdrawal penalties.

401(k) Withdrawal Options Are Not The Same As IRA's

First you have to acknowledge that different types of retirement accounts have different withdrawal options available. The withdrawal options for a down payment on a house from a 401(k) plan are not the same a the withdrawal options from a Traditional IRA. There is also a difference between Traditional IRA's and Roth IRA's.

401(k) Withdrawal Options

There may be loan or withdrawal options available through your employer sponsored retirement plan. I specifically say "may" because each company's retirement plan is different. You may have all or none of the options available to you that will be presented in this article. It all depends on how your company's 401(k) plan is designed. You can obtain information on your withdrawal options from the plan's Summary Plan Description also referred to as the "SPD".

Taking a 401(k) loan.............

The first option is a 401(k) loan.  Some plans allow you to borrow 50% of your vested balance in the plan up to a maximum of $50,000 in a 12 month period. Taking a loan from your 401(k) does not trigger a taxable event and you are not hit with the 10% early withdrawal penalty for being under the age of 59.5.  401(k) loans, like other loans, change interest but you are paying that interest to your own account so it is essentially an interest free loan. Typically 401(k) loans have a maximum duration of 5 years but if the loan is being used toward the purchase of a primary residence, the duration of the loan amortization schedule can be extended beyond 5 years if the plan's loan specifications allow this feature.

Note of caution, when you take a 401(k) loan, loan payments begin immediately after the loan check is received. As a result, your take home pay will be reduced by the amount of the loan payments. Make sure you are able to afford both the 401(k) loan payment and the new mortgage payment before considering this option.

The other withdrawal option within a 401(k) plan, if the plan allows, is a hardship distribution. As financial planners, we strongly recommend against hardship distributions for purposes of accumulating the cash needed for a down payment on your new house. Even though a hardship distribution gives you access to your 401(k) balance while you are still working, you will get hit with taxes and penalties on the amount withdrawn from the plan. Unlike IRA's which waive the 10% early withdrawal penalty for first time homebuyers, this exception is not available in 401(k) plans. When you total up the tax bill and the 10% early withdrawal penalty, the cost of this withdrawal option far outweighs the benefits.

If You Have A Roth IRA.......Read This.....

Roth IRA's can be one of the most advantageous retirement accounts to access for the down payment on a new house. With Roth IRA's, you make after tax contributions to the account, and as long as the account has been in existence for 5 years and you are over the age of 59� all of the earnings are withdrawn from the account 100% tax free. If you withdraw the investment earnings out of the Roth IRA before meeting this criteria, the earnings are taxed as ordinary income and a 10% early withdrawal penalty is assessed on the earnings portion of the account.

What very few people know is if you are under the age of 59� you have the option to withdraw just your after-tax contributions and leave the earnings in your Roth IRA. By doing so, you are able to access cash without taxation or penalty and the earnings portion of your Roth IRA will continue to grow and can be distributed tax free in retirement.

The $10,000 Exclusion From Traditional IRA's.......

Typically if you withdraw money out of your Traditional IRA prior to age 59� you have to pay ordinary income tax and a 10% early withdrawal penalty on the distribution. There are a few exceptions and one of them is the "first time homebuyer" exception. If you are purchasing your first house, you are allowed to withdrawal up to $10,000 from your Traditional IRA and avoid the 10% early withdrawal penalty. You will still have to pay ordinary income tax on the withdrawal but you will avoid the early withdrawal penalty. The $10,000 limit is an individual limit so if you and your spouse both have a traditional IRA, you could potentially withdrawal up to $20,000 penalty free.

Helping your child to buy a house..........

Here is a little known fact. You do not have to be the homebuyer. You can qualify for the early withdrawal exemption if you are helping your spouse, child, grandchild, or parent to buy their first house.

Be careful of the timing rules..........

There is a very important timing rule associated with this exception. The closing must take place within 120 day of the date that the withdrawal is taken from the IRA. If the closing happens after that 120 day window, the full 10% early withdrawal penalty will be assessed. There is also a special rollover rule for the first time homebuyer exemption which provides you with additional time to undo the withdrawal if need be. Typically with IRA's you are only allowed 60 days to put the money back into the IRA to avoid taxation and penalty on the IRA withdrawal. This is called a "60 Day Rollover". However, if you can prove that the money was distributed from the IRA with the intent to be used for a first time home purchase but a delay or cancellation of the closing brought you beyond the 60 day rollover window, the IRS provides first time homebuyers with a 120 window to complete the rollover to avoid tax and penalties on the withdrawal.

Don't Forget About The 60 Day Rollover Option

Another IRA withdrawal strategy that is used as a “bridge solution” is a “60 Day Rollover”. The 60 Day Rollover option is available to anyone with an IRA that has not completed a 60 day rollover within the past 12 months. If you are under the age of 59.5 and take a withdrawal from your IRA but you put the money back into the IRA within 60 days, it’s like the withdrawal never happened. We call it a “bridge solution” because you have to have the cash to put the money back into your IRA within 60 days to avoid the taxes and penalty. We frequently see this solution used when a client is simultaneously buying and selling a house. It’s often the intent that the seller plans to use the proceeds from the sale of their current house for the down payment on their new house. Unfortunately due to the complexity of the closing process, sometimes the closing on the new house will happen prior to the closing on the current house. This puts the homeowner in a cash strapped position because they don’t have the cash to close on the new house.

As long as the closing date on the house that you are selling happens within the 60 day window, you would be able to take a withdrawal from your IRA, use the cash from the IRA withdrawal for the closing on their new house, and then return the money to your IRA within the 60 day period from the house you sold. Unlike the “first time homebuyer” exemption which carries a $10,000 limit, the 60 day rollover does not have a dollar limit.

About Michael.........

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

Required Minimum Distribution Tax Strategies

If you are turning age 72 this year, this article is for you.  You will most likely have to start taking required minimum distributions from your retirement accounts.  This article will outline:

• Deadlines to take your RMD

• Tax implications

• Strategies to reduce your tax bill

How is my RMD calculated?

The IRS has a tax table that determines the amount that you have to take out of your retirement accounts each year. To determine your RMD amount you will need to obtain the December 31st balance in your retirement accounts, find your age on the IRS RMD tax table, and divide your 12/31 balance by the number listed next to your age in the tax table.

Exceptions to the RMD requirement........

There are two exceptions. First, Roth IRA’s do not require RMD’s.  Second, if you are still working, you maintain a balance in your current employer’s retirement plan, and you are not a 5%+ owner of the company, you do not need to take an RMD from that particular retirement account until you terminate employment with the company.  Which leads us to the first tax strategy.  If you are age 72 or older and you are still working, you can typically rollover your traditional IRA’s and former employer 401(k)/403(b) accounts into your current employers retirement plan.  By doing so, you avoid the requirement to take RMD’s from those retirement accounts outside of your current employers retirement plan and you avoid having to pay taxes on those required minimum distributions.  If you are 5%+ owner of the company, you are out of luck. The IRS will still require you to take the RMD from your retirement account even though you are still “employed” by the company.

Deadlines

In the year that you turn 72, if you do not meet one of the exceptions listed above, you will have a very important decision to make.  You have the option to take the RMD by 12/31 of that year or wait until the beginning of the following tax year.  For your first RMD, the deadline to take the RMD is April 1st of the year following the year that you turn age 72.   For example, if you turn 72 on June 2017, you will not be required to take your first RMD until April 1, 2018.  If you worked full time from January 2017 – June 2017, it may make sense for you to delay your first RMD until January 2018 because your income will most likely be higher in 2017 because you worked for half of the year.  When you take a RMD, like any other distribution from a pre-tax retirement account, it increases the amount of your taxable income for the year.  From a pure tax standpoint it usually makes snese to realize income from retirement accounts in years that you are in a lower tax bracket.

SPECIAL NOTE:  If you decided to delay your first RMD until after December 31st, you will be required to take two RMD’s in that year.  One prior to April 1st and the second before Decemeber 31st.  The April 1st rule only applies to your first RMD.  You should consult with your accountant to determine the best RMD strategy given your personal income tax situation.  For all tax years following the year that you turn age 72, the RMD deadline is December 31st.

VERY IMPORTANT:  Do not miss your RMD deadline.  The IRS hits you with a lovely 50% excise tax if you fail to take your RMD by the deadline.  If you were due a $4,000 RMD and you miss the deadline, the IRS is going to levy a $2,000 excise tax against you.

Contributions to charity to avoid taxes

 Another helpful tax strategy, if you make contributions to a charity, a church, or not-for-profit organization, you have the option with IRA’s to direct all or a portion of your RMD directly to these organization. In doing so, you satisfy your RMD but avoid having to pay income tax on the distribution from the IRA.  The number one rule here, the distribution must go directly from your IRA account to the not-for-profit organization.    At no point during this transaction can the owner of the IRA take possession of cash from the RMD otherwise the full amount will be taxable to the owner of the IRA.  Typically the custodian of your IRA will have to issue and mail a third party check directly to the not-for-profit organization. 

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

The Fiduciary Rule: Exposing Your 401(K) Advisor’s Secrets

It’s here.  On June 9, 2017, the long awaited Fiduciary Rule for 401(k) plans will arrive.  The wirehouse and broker-dealer community within the investment industry has fought this new rule every step of the way.  Why? Because their secrets are about to be exposed.  Fee gouging in these 401(k) plans has spiraled out of control and it has gone on for way too long.  While the Fiduciary Rule was designed to better protect plan participants within these employer sponsored retirement plans, the response from the broker-dealer community, in an effort to protect themselves, may actually drive the fees in 401(k) plans higher than they are now.

If your company sponsors an employer sponsored retirement plan and your investment advisor is a broker with one of the main stream wirehouse or broker dealers then they may be approaching you within the next few months regarding a “platform change” for your 401(k) plan.  Best advice, start asking questions before you sign anything!!  The brokerage community is going to try to gift wrap this change and present this as a value added service to their current 401(k) clients when the reality is this change is being forced onto the brokerage community and they are at great risk at losing their 401(k) clients to independent registered investment advisory firms that have served as co-fiduciaries to their plans along.

The Fiduciary Rule requires all investment advisors that handle 401(k) plans to act in the best interest of their clients.  Up until now may brokers were not held to this standard. As long as they delivered the appropriate disclosure documents to the client, the regulations did not require them to act in their client’s best interest. Crazy right?  Well that’s all about to change and the response of the brokerage community will shock you.

I will preface this article by stating that there have been a variety of responses by the broker-dealer community to this new regulation.  While we cannot reasonably gather information on every broker-dealers response to the Fiduciary Rule, this article will provide information on how many of the brokerage firms are responding to the new legislation given our independent research.

SECRET #1:

Many of the brokerage dealers are restricting what 401(k) platforms their brokers can use.  If the broker currently has 401(k) clients that maintain a plan with a 401(k) platform outside of their new “approved list”, they are forcing them to move the plan to a pre-approved platform or the broker will be required to resign as the advisor to the plan.  Even though your current 401(k) platform may be better than the new proposed platform, the broker may attempt to move your plan so they can keep the plan assets.  How is this remotely in your employee’s best interest? But it’s happening.  We have been told that some of these 401(k) providers end up on the “pre-approve list” because they are willing to share fees with the broker dealer. If you don’t share fees, you don’t make the list.  Really ugly stuff!!

SECRET #2:

Because these wirehouses and broker-dealers know that their brokers are not “experts” in 401(k) plans, many of the brokerage firms are requiring their 401(k) plans to add a third-party fiduciary service which usually results in higher plan fees.  The question to ask is “if you were so concerned about our fiduciary liability why did you wait until now to present this third party fiduciary service?”  They are doing this to protect themselves, not the client.   Also, many of these third party fiduciary services could standardize the investment menu and take the control of the investment menu away from the broker.  Which begs the question, what are you paying the broker for?

SECRET #3:

Some broker-dealers are responding to the Fiduciary Rule by forcing their brokers to move all their 401(k) plans to a “fee based platform” versus a commission based platform.  The plan participants may have paid commissions on investments when they were purchased within their 401(k) account and now could be forced out of those investments and locked into a fee based fee structure after they already paid a commission on their balance.  This situation will be common for 401(k) plans that are comprised primarily of self-directed brokerage accounts.  Make sure you ask the advisor about the impact of the fee structure change and any deferred sales charges that may be imposed due to the platform change.

SECRET #4:

The plan fees are often times buried.  The 401(k) industry has gotten very good at hiding fees.  They talk in percentages and basis points but rarely talk in hard dollars.  One percent does not sound like a lot but if you have a $2 million dollar 401(k) plan that equals $20,000 in fees coming out of the plans assets every year.  Most of the fees are buried in the mutual fund expense ratios and you basically have to be an investment expert to figure out how much you are paying.  This has continued to go on because very rarely do companies write a check for their 401(k) fees. Most plans debit plan assets for their plan fees but the fees are real.

With all of these changes taking place, now is the perfect time to take a good hard look at your company’s employer sponsored retirement plan.  If your current investment advisor approaches you with a recommended “platform change” that is a red flag.  Start asking a lot of questions and it may be a good time to put your plan out to bid to see if you can negotiate a better overall solution for you and your employees.

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

Strategies to Save for Retirement with No Company Retirement Plan

The question, “How much do I need to retire?” has become a concern across generations rather than something that only those approaching retirement focus on.  We wrote the article, How Much Money Do I Need To Save To Retire?, to help individuals answer this question.  This article is meant to help create a strategy to reach that number.  More specifically, for those who work at a company that does not offer a company sponsored plan.

Over the past 20 years, 401(k) plans have become the most well-known investment vehicle for individuals saving for retirement.  This type of plan, along with other company sponsored plans, are excellent ways to save for people who are offered them.  Company sponsored plans are set up by the company and money comes directly from the employees paycheck to fund their retirement.  This means less effort on the side of the individual.  It is up to the employee to be educated on how the plan operates and use the resources available to them to help in their savings strategy and goals but the vehicle is there for them to take advantage of.

We also wrote the article, Comparing Different Types of Employer Sponsored Retirement Plans, to help business owners choose a retirement plan that is most beneficial to them in their retirement savings.

Now back to our main focus on savings strategies for people that do not have access to an employer sponsored plan.  We will discuss options based on a few different scenarios because matters such as marital status and how much you’d like to save may impact which strategy makes the most sense for you.

Married Filing Jointly - One Spouse Covered by Employer Sponsored Plan and is Not Maxing Out

A common strategy we use for clients when a covered spouse is not maxing out their deferrals is to increase the deferrals in the retirement plan and supplement income with the non-covered spouse’s salary.  The limits for 401(k) deferrals in 2021 is $19,500 for individuals under 50 and $26,000 for individuals 50+.  For example, if I am covered and only contribute $8,000 per year to my account and my spouse is not covered but has additional money to save for retirement, I could increase my deferrals up to the plan limits using the amount of additional money we have to save.  This strategy is helpful as it allows for easier tracking of retirement accounts and the money is automatically deducted from payroll.  Also, if you are contributing pre-tax dollars, this will decrease your tax liability.

Note:  Payroll deferrals must be withheld from payroll by 12/31.  If you owe money when you file your taxes in April, you would not be able to go back and increase your deferrals in your company plan for that tax year.

Married Filing Jointly - One Spouse Covered by Employer Sponsored Plan and is Maxing Out

If the covered spouse is maxing out at the high limits already, you may be able to save additional pre-tax dollars depending on your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI).

Below is the Traditional IRA Deductibility Table for 2021.  This table shows how much individuals or married couples can earn and still deduct IRA contributions from their taxable income.

As shown in the chart, if you are married filing jointly and one spouse is covered, the couple can fully deduct IRA contributions to an account in the covered spouses name if AGI is less than $99,000 and can fully deduct IRA contributions to an account in the non-covered spouses name if AGI is less than $184,000.  The Traditional IRA limits for 2017 are $5,500 if under 50 and $6,500 if 50+.  These lower limits and income thresholds make contributing to company sponsor plans more attractive in most cases.

Single or Married Filing Jointly and Neither Spouse is Covered

If you (and your spouse if married filing joint) are not covered by an employer sponsored plan, you do not have an income threshold for contributing pre-tax dollars to a Traditional IRA.  The only limitations you have relate to the amount you can contribute.  These contribution limits for both Traditional and Roth IRA’s are $5,500 if under 50 and $6,500 if 50+.  If married filing joint, each spouse can contribute up to these limits.

Unlike employer sponsored plans, your contributions to IRA’s can be made after 12/31 of that tax year as long as the contributions are in before you file your tax return.

Please feel free to e-mail or call with any questions on this article or any other financial planning questions you may have.

Below are related articles that may help answer additional questions you have after reading this.

Traditional vs. Roth IRA’s: Differences, Pros, and Cons

A New Year: Should I Make Changes To My Retirement Account?

Backdoor Roth IRA Contribution Strategy

About Rob……...

Hi, I’m Rob Mangold. I’m the Chief Operating Officer at Greenbush Financial Group and a contributor to the Money Smart Board blog. We created the blog to provide strategies that will help our readers personally , professionally, and financially. Our blog is meant to be a resource. If there are questions that you need answered, pleas feel free to join in on the discussion or contact me directly.

A New Year: Should I Make Changes To My Retirement Account?

A simple and easy answer to this question would be…..Maybe?  Not only would that answer make this article extremely short, it wouldn’t explain some important items that participants should take into consideration when making decisions about their retirement plan.Every time the calendar adds a year we get a sense of reset.  A lot of the same tasks on the to do list get added each January and hopefully this article helps you focus on matters to consider regarding your retirement plan.

Should I Consult With The Advisor On My Plan?

At our firm we make an effort to meet with participants at least annually.  Saving in company retirement plans is about longevity so many times the individual meetings are brief and no allocation changes are made.  Even if this is the result, an overview of your account, at least annually, is a good way to keep retirement savings fresh in your mind and add a sense of comfort that you’re investing appropriately based on your time horizon and risk tolerance.

These individual meetings are also a good time to discuss other financial questions you may have.  Your retirement plan is only a piece of your financial plan and we encourage participants to use the resources available to them.  Often times these meetings start off as a simple account overview but turn into lengthy conversations about various financial decisions the participant has been weighing.

How Much Should I Be Contributing This Year?

This answer is not the same for everyone because, among other things, people have different retirement goals, financial situations, and time horizon.  That being said, if the  company has a match component in their plan, the first milestone would be to contribute enough to receive the most the company is willing to give you.  For example, if the company will match 100% of your contributions up to 3% of pay, any amount you contribute less than 3% will leave you missing out on retirement savings the company is willing to provide you.

Again, the amount that should be saved is dependent on the individual but saving anywhere from 10% to 15% of your compensation is a good benchmark.  In the previous example, if the company will match 3%, that means you would have to contribute 7% to achieve the lower end of that benchmark.  This may seem like a difficult task so starting at an amount you are comfortable with and working your way to your ultimate goal is important.

Should You Be Making Allocation Changes?

The initial allocation you choose for your retirement account is important.  Selecting the   appropriate portfolio from the start based on your risk tolerance and time until retirement can satisfy your investment needs for a number of years.  The chart below shows that over longer periods of time historical annual returns tend to be less volatile.

When you have over 10 years until retirement, reviewing the account at least annually is   important as there are a number of reasons you would want to change your allocation.  Lifestyle changes, different retirement goals, or specific investment performance to name a few. Participants tend to lose out on investment return when they try to time the market and are forced to sell low and buy high.  This chart shows that even though there may be volatility in the short term, as long as you have time and an appropriate allocation from the start, you should see returns that will help you achieve your retirement goals. 

About Rob……...

Hi, I’m Rob Mangold. I’m the Chief Operating Officer at Greenbush Financial Group and a contributor to the Money Smart Board blog. We created the blog to provide strategies that will help our readers personally , professionally, and financially. Our blog is meant to be a resource. If there are questions that you need answered, pleas feel free to join in on the discussion or contact me directly.

Traditional vs. Roth IRA’s: Differences, Pros, and Cons

Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA’s) are one of the most popular retirement vehicles available for savers and the purpose of this article is to give a general idea of how IRA’s work, explain the differences between Traditional and Roth IRA’s, and provide some pros and cons of each.  In January 2015, The Investment Company Institute put out a research report with some interesting statistics regarding IRA’s which can be found at the following link, ICI Research Perspective.  The article states, “In mid-2014, 41.5 million, or 33.7 percent of U.S. households owned at least one type of IRA”.  At first I was slightly shocked and asked myself the following question: “If IRA’s are the most important investment vehicle and source of income for most retirees, how do only one third of U.S. households own one?”  Then when I took a step back and considered how money gets deposited into these retirement vehicles this figure begins making more sense.

Yes, a lot of American’s will contribute to IRA’s throughout their lifetime whether it is to save for retirement throughout one’s lifetime or each year when the CPA gives you the tax bill and you ask “What can I do to pay less?”  When thinking about IRA’s in this way, one third of American’s owning IRA’s is a scary figure and leads one to believe more than half the country is not saving for retirement. This is not necessarily the case.  401(k) plans and other employer sponsored defined contribution plans have become very popular over the last 20 years and rather than individuals opening their own personal IRA’s, they are saving for retirement through their employer sponsored plan.

Employees with access to these employer plans save throughout their working years and then, when they retire, the money in the company retirement account will be rolled into IRA’s.  If the money is rolled directly from the company sponsored plan into an IRA, there is likely no tax or penalty as it is going from one retirement account to another.  People roll the balance into IRA’s for a number of reasons.  These reasons include the point that there is likely more flexibility with IRA’s regarding distributions compared to the company plan, more investment options available, and the retiree would like the money to be managed by an advisor.  The IRA’s allow people to draw on their savings to pay for expenses throughout retirement in a way to supplement income that they are no longer receiving through a paycheck.

The process may seem simple but there are important strategies and decisions involved with IRA’s.  One of those items is deciding whether a Traditional, Roth or both types of IRA’s are best for you.  In this article we will breakdown Traditional and Roth IRA’s which should illustrate why deciding the appropriate vehicle to use can be a very important piece of retirement planning.

Why are they used?

Both Traditional and Roth IRA’s have multiple uses but the most common for each is retirement savings.  People will save throughout their lifetime with the goal of having enough money to last in retirement.  These savings are what people are referring to when they ask questions like “What is my number?”  Savers will contribute to retirement accounts with the intent to earn money through investing.  Tax benefits and potential growth is why people will use retirement accounts over regular savings accounts.  Retirees have to cover expenses in retirement which are likely greater than the social security checks they receive.  Money is pulled from retirement accounts to cover the expenses above what is covered by social security.  People are living longer than they have in the past which means the answer to “What is my number?” is becoming larger since the money must last over a greater period.

How much can I contribute?

For both Traditional and Roth IRA’s, the limit in 2021 for individuals under 50 is the lesser of $6,000 or 100% of MAGI and those 50 or older is the lesser of $7,000 or 100% of MAGI. More limit information can be found on the IRS website Retirement Topics - IRA Contribution Limits

What are the important differences between Traditional and Roth?

Taxation

Traditional (Pre-Tax) IRA:  Typically people are more familiar with Traditional IRA’s as they’ve been around longer and allow individuals to take income off the table and lower their tax bill while saving.  Each year a person contributes to a Pre-Tax IRA, they deduct the contribution amount from the income they received in that tax year.  The IRS allows this because they want to encourage people to save for retirement.  Not only are people decreasing their tax bill in the year they make the contribution, the earnings of Pre-Tax IRA’s are not taxed until the money is withdrawn from the account.  This allows the account to earn more as money is not being taken out for taxes during the accumulation phase.  For example, if I have $100 in my account and the account earns 10% this year, I will have $10 of earnings.  Since that money is not taxed, my account value will be $110.  That $110 will increase more in the following year if the account grows another 10% compared to if taxes were taken out of the gain.  When the money is used during retirement, the individual will be taxed on the amount distributed at ordinary income tax rates because the money was never taxed before.  A person’s tax rate during retirement is likely to be lower than while they are working because total income for the year will most likely be less.  If the account owner takes a distribution prior to 59 ½ (normal retirement age), there will be penalties assessed.

Roth (After-Tax) IRA:  The Roth IRA was established by the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997.  Unlike the Traditional IRA, contributions to a Roth IRA are made with money that has already been subject to income tax.  The money gets placed in these accounts with the intent of earning interest and then when the money is taken during retirement, there is no taxes due as long as the account has met certain requirements (i.e. has been established for at least 5 years).  These accounts are very beneficial to people who are younger or will not need the money for a significant number of years because no tax is paid on all the earnings that the account generates.  For example, if I contribute $100 to a Roth IRA and the account becomes $200 in 15 years, I will never pay taxes on the $100 gain the account generated.  If the account owner takes a distribution prior to 59 ½ (normal retirement age), there will be penalties assessed on the earnings taken.

Eligibility

Traditional IRA:  Due to the benefits the IRS allows with Traditional IRA’s, there are restrictions on who can contribute and receive the tax benefit for these accounts.  Below is a chart that shows who is eligible to deduct contributions to a Traditional IRA:

There are also Required Minimum Distributions (RMD’s) associated with Pre-Tax dollars in IRA’s and therefore people cannot contribute to these accounts after the age of 70 ½.  Once the account owner turns 70 ½, the IRS forces the individual to start taking distributions each year because the money has never been taxed and the government needs to start receiving revenue from the account.  If RMD’s are not taken timely, there will be penalties assessed.

Roth IRA:  As long as an individual has earned income, there are only income limitations on who can contribute to Roth IRA’s.  The limitations for 2021 are as follows:

There are a number of strategies to get money into Roth IRA’s as a financial planning strategy.  This method is explained in our article Backdoor Roth IRA Contribution Strategy.

Investment Strategies

Investment strategies are different for everyone as individuals have different risk tolerances, time horizons, and purposes for these accounts.

That being said, Roth IRA’s are often times invested more aggressively because they are likely the last investment someone touches during retirement or passes on to heirs.  A longer time horizon allows one to be more aggressive if the circumstances permit.  Accounts that are more aggressive will likely generate higher returns over longer periods.  Remember, Roth accounts are meant to generate income that will never be taxed, so in most cases that account should be working for the saver as long as possible.  If money is passed onto heirs, the Roth accounts are incredibly valuable as the individual who inherits the account can continue earning interest tax free.

Choosing the correct IRA is an important decision and is often times more complex than people think.  Even if you are 30 years from retiring, it is important to consider the benefits of each and consult with a professional for advice. 

About Rob……...

Hi, I’m Rob Mangold. I’m the Chief Operating Officer at Greenbush Financial Group and a contributor to the Money Smart Board blog. We created the blog to provide strategies that will help our readers personally , professionally, and financially. Our blog is meant to be a resource. If there are questions that you need answered, pleas feel free to join in on the discussion or contact me directly.