Federal Disaster Area Penalty-Free IRA & 401(k) Distribution and Loan Options

Individuals who experience a hurricane, flood, wildfire, earthquake, or other type of natural disaster may be eligible to request a Qualified Disaster Recovery Distribution or loan from their 401(k) or IRA to assist financially with the recovery process.  The passing of the Secure Act 2.0 opened up new distribution and loan options for individuals whose primary residence is in an area that has been officially declared a “Federal Disaster” area.

Qualified Disaster Recovery Distributions (QDRD)

In December 2022, the passing of the Secure Act 2.0 made permanent, a distribution option within both 401(K) plans and IRAs, that allows individuals to distribute up to $22,000 from either a 401(k) or IRA, and that distribution is exempt from the 10% early withdrawal penalty.  Typically, when an individual is under the age of 59½ and takes a distribution from a 401(K) or IRA, the distribution is subject to both taxes and a 10% early withdrawal penalty. 

For an individual, it’s an aggregate of $22,000 between both their 401(k) and IRA accounts, meaning, they can’t distribute $22,000 from their IRA and then another $22,000 from their 401(k), and avoid the 10% penalty on the full $44,000.  

If you are married, if each spouse has an IRA and/or 401(k) plan, each spouse would be eligible to process a qualified disaster recovery distribution for the full $22,000 and avoid the 10% penalty on the combined $44,000.    

Taxation of Federal Disaster Distributions 

Even though these distributions are exempt from the 10% early withdrawal penalty, they are still subject to federal and state income taxes, but the taxpayer has two options:

1. The taxpayer can elect to include the full amount of the distribution as taxable income in the year that the QDRD takes place; OR

2. The taxpayer can elect to spread the taxable amount evenly over a 3-year period that begins the year that distribution occurred. 

Here is an example of the tax options. Tim is age 40, he lives in Florida, and his area experiences a hurricane.  Shortly after the hurricane, the area where Tim’s house is located was officially declared a Federal Disaster Area by FEMA. To help pay for the damage to his primary residence, Tim processes a $12,000 qualified disaster recovery distribution from his Traditional IRA.  Tim would not have to pay the 10% early withdrawal penalty due to the QDRD exception, but he would be required to pay federal income tax on the full $12,000. He has the option to either report the full $12,000 on his tax return in the year the distribution took place, or he could elect to spread the $12,000 tax liability over the next 3 years, reporting $4,000 in additional taxable income each year beginning the year that the QDRD took place.  

Repayment Option

If an individual completes a disaster recovery distribution from their 401(k) or IRA, they have the option to repay the money to the account within 3 years of the date of the distribution.  This allows them to recoup the taxes paid on the distribution by filing an amended tax return(s) for the year or years that the tax liability was reported from the QDRD. 

180 Day & Financial Loss Requirement

To make an individual eligible to request a QDRD, not only does their primary residence have to be located within a Federal Disaster area, but they also need to request the QDRD within 180 days of the disaster, and they must have sustained an economic loss on account of the disaster.

QDRD Are Optional Provisions Within 401(k) Plans

If you have a 401(k) plan, a Qualified Disaster Recovery Distribution is an OPTIONAL provision that must be adopted by the plan sponsor of a 401(k) to provide their employees with this distribution option. In other words, your employer is not required to allow these disaster recovery distributions, they have to adopt them. If you live in an area that is declared a federal disaster area and your 401(k) plan does not allow this type of distribution option, you can contact your employer and request that it be added to the plan.  Many companies may not be aware that this is a voluntary distribution option that can be added to their plan.

If you have an IRA, as long as you meet the criteria for a QDRD, you are eligible to request this type of distribution. 

If you have a 401(k) plan with a former employer and their plan does not allow QDRD, you may be able to rollover the balance in the 401(k) to an IRA, and then request the QDRD from the IRA. 

What Changed?

Prior to the passing of Secure Act 2.0, Congress had to authorize these Qualified Disaster Recovery Distributions for each disaster.  Section 331 of the Secure Act 2.0 made these QDRDs permanent. 

However, one drawback is in the past, these qualified disaster recovery distributions were historically allowed up to $100,000, but the new tax law lowered the maximum QDRD amount to only $22,000. 

$100,000 401(k) Loan for Disaster Relief

In addition to the qualified disaster recovery distributions, Secure Act 2.0, also allows plan participants in 401(K) plans to request loans up to the LESSER of $100,000 or 100% of their vested balance in the plan. 

Typically, when plan participants request loans from a 401(K) plan, the maximum amount is the LESSER of $50,000 or 50% of their vested balance in the plan.  Secure Act 2.0, doubled that amount.  The eligibility requirements to receive a disaster recovery 401(k) loan are the same as the eligibility requirements for a Qualified Disaster Recovery Distribution. 

In addition to the higher loan limit, plan participants eligible for a 401(K) qualified disaster recovery loan, are also allowed to delay the start date of their loan payments for up to 1 year from the loan processing date.  Normally when a 401(K) loan is requested, loan payments begin immediately.

These loans are still subject to the 5-year duration limit, but with the optional 12-month delay in the loan payment start date, the maximum duration of these qualified disaster loans is technically 6 years.

401(K) Loans Are an Optional Provision

Similar to Qualified Disaster Recovery Distributions, 401(k) loans are an optional provision that must be adopted by the plan sponsor of a 401(k) plan. Some plans allow plan participants to take loans while others do not, so the ability to take these disaster recovery loans will vary from plan to plan.

Loans Are Only Available In Qualified Retirement Plans

The $100,000 loan option is only available for Qualified Retirement Plans such as 401(k) and 403(b) plans.  IRAs do not provide a loan option. The $22,000 Qualified Disaster Recovery Distribution is the only option for IRAs unless Congress specifically authorizes a higher maximum distribution amount for a specific Federal Disaster, which is within their power to do.

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

Starting in 2024, 401(k) Plan Will Be Required to Cover Part-time Employees

In the past, companies have been allowed to limit access to their 401(k) plan to just full-time employees but that is about to change starting in 2024.  With the passing of the Secure Act, beginning in 2024, companies that sponsor 401(K) plans will be required to allow part-time employees to participate in their qualified retirement plans.

It’s very important for companies to make note of this now because many companies will need to start going through their employee census data to identify the part-time employees that will become eligible for the 401(K) plan on January 1, 2024. Failure to properly notify these part-time employees of their eligibility to participate in the plan could result in plan compliance failures, DOL penalties, and it could require the company to make a mandatory employer contribution to those employees for the missed deferral opportunity.

Full-time Employee Restriction

Prior to the passing of the Secure Act 1.0 in December 2019, 401(K) plans were allowed to limit participation in plans to employees that had completed 1 year of service which is commonly defined as 12 months of employment AND 1,000 hours worked within that 12-month period. The 1 year wait with the 1,000 hours requirement allowed companies to keep part-time employees who work less than 1,000 hours from participating in the company’s 401(k) plan.   

Secure Act 1.0

When Congress passed Secure Act 1.0 in December 2019, it included a new provision that requires 401(K) plans to cover part-time employees who have completed three consecutive years of service and worked 500 or more hours during each of those years to participate in the plan starting in 2024. For purposes of the 3 consecutive years and 500 hours requirement, companies are only required to track employee service back to January 1, 2021, any services prior to that date, can be disregarded for purposes of this new part-time employee coverage requirement. 

Example: John works for Company ABC which sponsors a 401(k) plan. The plan restricts eligibility to 1 year and 1,000 hours.  John has been working part-time for Company ABC since March 2020 and he worked the following hours in 2021, 2022, and 2023:

• 2021 Hours Worked:  560

• 2022 Hours Worked: 791

• 2023 Hours Worked: 625

Since John had never worked more than 1,000 hours in a 12-month period, he was never eligible to participate in the ABC 401(k) plan.  However, under the new Secure Act 1.0 rules, ABC would be required to allow John to participate in the plan starting January 1, 2024, because he works for three consecutive years with more than 500 hours.

Excluded Employees

The new part-time employee coverage requirement does not apply to employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement or nonresident aliens.  401(K) plans are still allowed to exclude those employees regardless of hours worked.

Employee Deferrals Only

For the part-time employees that meet the 3 consecutive years and 500+ hours of service each year, while the new rules require them to be offered the opportunity to participate in the 401(k) plan, it only requires plans to make them eligible to participate in the employee deferral portion of the plan.  It does not require them to be eligible for EMPLOYER contributions.  For part-time employees who become eligible to participate under these new rules, they are allowed to put their own money into the plan, but the company is not required to provide them with an employer matching, employer non-elective, profit sharing, or safe harbor contributions until that employee has met the plan’s full eligibility requirements.

In the example we looked at previously with John, John would be allowed to voluntarily make employee contributions from his paycheck but if the company sponsors an employer matching contribution that requires employees to work 1 year and 1,000 hours to be eligible, John would not be eligible to receive the employer matching contribution even though he is eligible to make employee contributions to the plan.

Secure Act 2.0

Up until now, we have covered the new part-time employee coverage requirements under Secure Act 1.0.  However, in December 2022, Congress passed Secure Act 2.0, which changed the part-time employee coverage requirements beginning January 1, 2025.  The main change that Secure Act 2.0 made is it reduced the 3 Consecutive Years down to 2 Consecutive Years starting in 2025.   Both still require 500 or more hours each year but now a part-time employee will only need to complete 2 consecutive years of 500 or more hours instead of 3 beginning in 2025.

Also in 2025, under Secure Act 2.0, for purposes of assessing the 2 consecutive years with 500 or more hours, companies only have to look at service dating back to January 1, 2023, employment before that date is excluded from this part-time employee coverage exception. 

2024 & 2025 Summary

Starting in 2024, employers will need to look back as far as January 1, 2021, and identify part-time employees who worked at least 3 consecutive years with 500 or more hours worked in each of those three years.

Starting in 2025, employers will need to look at both definitions of part-time employees.  The Secure Act 1.0, three consecutive years of 500 hours or more going back to January 1, 2021, and separately, the Secure Act 2.0, 2 consecutive years of 500 hours or more going back to January 1, 2023.  An employee could technically become eligible under either definition. 

Penalties For Not Notifying Part-time Employees of Eligibility

Companies should take this new part-time employee eligibility rule very seriously.  Failure to properly notify part-time employees of their eligibility to make employee deferrals to the 401(K) plan could result in a plan compliance failure and the assessment of Department of Labor penalties. The DOL conducts random audits of 401(K) plans and one of the primary pieces of information that they typically request during an audit is for the employer to provide a full employee census file and be able to prove that they properly notified each eligible employee of their ability to participate in the company’s 401(K) plan. 

In addition to fines for not properly notifying these new part-time employees of their ability to participate in the plan, the DOL could require the company to make a “QNEC”  (Qualified Non-Elective Contribution) on behalf of those part-time employees which is a pure EMPLOYER contribution.   Even though these part-time employees might not be eligible for other employer contributions in the plan, this QNEC funded by the employer is to make up for the missed employee deferral opportunity.  The DOL is basically saying that since the company did not properly notify the employee of their ability to make contributions out of their paycheck, now the company has to fund those contributions on their behalf.  They could assign the QNEC amount equal to the average percentage of compensation amount deferred by the rest of the employees covered by the plan which could be a very costly mistake for an employer.

Why The Rule Change?

There are two primary drivers that led to the adoption of this new 401(k) part-time employee coverage requirement.  First, acknowledging a change in the U.S. labor force, where instead of employees working one full-time job, more employees are working multiple part-time jobs.  By working multiple part-time jobs with different employers, while that employee may work more than 1000 hours a year, they may never become eligible to participate in any of their employer’s 401(K) plans because they were not considered full-time with any single employer.

This brings us to the second driver of this new rule, which is increasing access for more employees to an employer-based retirement-saving solution.   Given the increase in life expectancy, there is a retirement savings shortfall issue within the U.S., and giving employees easier access to employer-based solutions may encourage more employees to save more for retirement.  

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

3 New Startup 401(k) Tax Credits

When Congress passed the Secure Act 2.0 in December 2022, they introduced new tax credits and enhanced old tax credits for startup 401(k) plans. There are now 3 different tax credits that are available for startup 401(k) plans that were put into place to help companies to subsidize the cost of sponsoring a retirement plan and also to subsidize employer contributions made to the employees to enhance the company’s overall benefits package. Here are the 3 startup 401(k) credits that are now available to employers:

• Startup Tax Credit (Plan Cost Credit)

• Employer Contribution Tax Credit

• Automatic Enrollment Tax Credit

Startup Tax Credit

To incentivize companies to adopt an employer-sponsored retirement plan for their employees, Secure Act 2.0 enhanced the startup tax credits available to employers starting in 2023.  This tax credit was put into place to help businesses offset the cost of establishing and maintaining a retirement plan for their employees for the first 3 years of the plan’s existence.  Under the new Secure 2.0 credit, certain businesses will be eligible to receive a tax credit for up to 100% of the annual plan costs.

A company must meet the following requirement to be eligible to capture this startup tax credit:

1. The company may have no more than 100 employees who received compensation of $5,000 or more in the PRECEDING year; and

2. The company did not offer a retirement plan covering substantially the same employees during the PREVIOUS 3 YEARS.

3. The plan covers at least one non-HCE (non-Highly Compensated Employee or NHCE)  

To identify if you have a NHCE, you have to look at LAST YEAR’s compensation and both this year’s and last year’s ownership percentage.  For the 2023 plan year, a NHCE is any employee that:

• Does NOT own more than 5% of the company; and

• Had less than $135,000 in compensation in 2022.  For the compensation test, you look back at the previous year’s compensation to determine who is a HCE or NHCE in the current plan year.    For 2023, you look at 2022 compensation.  The IRS typically increases the compensation threshold each year for inflation.

A note here about “attribution rules”.  The IRS is aware that small business owners have the ability to maneuver around ownership and compensation thresholds, so there are special attribution rules that are put into place to limit the “creativity” of small business owners.   For example, ownership is shared or “attributed” between spouses, which means if you own 100% of the business, your spouse that works for the business, even though they are not an owner and only earn $30,000 in W2, they are considered a HCE because they are attributed your 100% ownership in the business.   

Besides just attribution rules, employer-sponsored retirement plans also has control group rules, affiliated service group rules, and other fun rules that further limit creativity.  Especially for individuals that are owners of multiple businesses, these special 401(k) rules can create obstacles when attempting to qualify for these tax credits. Bottom line, before blindly putting a retirement plan in place to qualify for these tax credits, make sure you talk to a professional within the 401(k) industry that understands all of these rules.

401(k) Startup Tax Credit Amount

Let’s assume your business qualifies for the 401(k) startup tax credit, what is the amount of the tax credit?  Here are the details:

• For companies with 50 employees or less: The credit covers 100% of the company’s plan costs up to an annual limit of the GREATER of $500 or $250 multiplied by the number of plan-eligible NHCE, up to a maximum credit of $5,000.

• For companies with 51 to 100 employees: The credit covers 50% of the company’s plan costs up to an annual limit of the GREATER of $500 or $250 multiplied by the number of plan-eligible NHCE, up to a maximum credit of $5,000.

This is a federal tax credit that is available to eligible employers for the first 3 years that the new plan is in existence.  If you have enough NHCE’s, you could technically qualify for $5,000 each year for the first 3 years that the retirement plan is in place.

A note on the definition of “plan-eligible NHCEs”.  These are NHCEs that are also eligible to participate in your plan in the current plan year.  NHCEs that are not eligible to participate because they have yet to meet the eligibility requirement, do not count toward the max credit calculation.   

What Type of Plan Costs Qualify For The Credit?

Qualified costs include costs paid by the employer to:

• Setup the Plan

• Administer the Plan (TPA Fees)

• Recordkeeping Fees

• Investment Advisory Fees

• Employee Education Fees

To be eligible for the credit, the costs must be paid by the employer directly to the service provider. Fees charged against the plan assets or included in the mutual fund expense ratios do not qualify for the credit.  Since historically many startup plans use 401(k) platforms that utilize higher expense ratio mutual funds to help subsidize some of the out-of-pocket cost to the employer, these higher tax credits may change the platform approach for start-up plans because the employer and the employee may both be better off by utilizing a platform with low expense ratio mutual funds, and the employer pays the TPA, recordkeeping, and investment advisor fees directly in order to qualify for the credit.

Note: It’s not uncommon for the owners of the company to have larger balances in the plan compared to the employees, so they also benefit by not having the plan fee paid out of plan assets.

Startup Tax Credit Example

A company has 20 employees, 2 HCEs and 18 NHCEs, and all 20 employees are currently eligible to participate in the new 401(k) plan that the company just started in 2023.  During 2023, the company paid $3,000 in total plan fees directly to the TPA firm, investment advisor, and recordkeeper of the plan.  Here is the credit calculation:

18 Eligible NHCEs x $250 = $4,500

Total 401(k) Startup Credit for 2023 = $3,000

Even though this company would have been eligible for a $4,500 tax credit, the credit cannot exceed the total fees paid by the employer to the 401(k) service providers, and the total plan fees in this example were $3,000. 

No Carry Forward

If the company incurs plan costs over and above the credit amount, the new tax law does not allow plan costs that exceed the maximum credit to be carried forward into future tax years.

Solo(k) Plans Are Not Eligible for Startup Tax Credit

Due to the owner-only nature of a Solo(K) plan, there would not be any NHCEs in a Solo(K) plan, so they would not be eligible for the startup tax credit.

401(k) Employer Contribution Tax Credit

This is a new tax credit starting in 2023 that will provide companies with a tax credit for all or a portion of the employer contribution that is made to the 401(k) plan for employees earning no more than $100,000 in compensation. 

The eligible requirement for this employer contribution credit is similar to that of the startup tax credit with one difference:

1. The company may have no more than 100 employees who received compensation of $5,000 or more in the PRECEDING year; and

2. The company did not offer a retirement plan covering substantially the same employees during the PREVIOUS 5 YEARS.

3. The plan makes an employer contribution for at least one employee whose annual compensation is not above $100,000.   

Employer Contribution Tax Credit Calculation

The maximum credit is assessed on a per-employee basis and for each employee is the LESSER of:

• Actual employer contribution amount; or

• $1,000 for each employee making $100,000 or less in FICA wages

$1,000 Per Employee Limit

The $1,000 limit is applied to each INDIVIDUAL employee’s employer contribution.  It is NOT a blindfolded calculation of $1,000 multiped by each of your employees under $100,000 in comp regardless of the amount of their actual employer contribution.

For example, Company RTE has two employees making under $100,000 per year, Sue and Rick.  Sue receives an employer contribution of $3,000 and Rick received an employer contribution of $400.  The max employer contribution credit would be $1,400,  $400 for Rick’s employer contribution, and $1,000 for Sue’s contribution since she would be subject to the $1,000 per employee cap. 

S-Corp Owners

As mentioned above, the credit only applies to employees with less than $100,000 in annual compensation but what about S-corp owners? The only compensation that is taken into account for S-corp owners for purposes of retirement plan contributions is their W2 income.  So what happens when an S-corp owner has W2 income of $80K but takes a $500,000 dividend from the S-corp?  Good news for S-corp owners, the $100,000 comp threshold only looks at the plan compensation which for S-corp owners is just their W2 income, so an employer contribution for an S-corp would be eligible for this credit as long as their W2 is below $100,000 but they would still be subject to the $1,000 per employee cap. 

5-Year Decreasing Scale

Unlike the startup tax credit that stays the same for the first 3 years of the plan’s existence, the Employer Contribution Tax Credit decreases after year 2 but lasts for 5 years instead of just 3 years.   Similar to the startup tax credit, there is a deviation in the calculation depending on whether the company has more or less than 50 employees.

For companies that have 50 or fewer employees, the employer contribution tax credit phase-down schedule is as follows:

• Year 1: 100%

• Year 2: 100%

• Year 3:    75%

• Year 4: 50%

• Year 5: 25%

50 or Less Employee Example

Company XYZ starts a new 401(k) plan for their employees in 2023 and offers a safe harbor employer matching contribution.  The company has 20 eligible employees, 18 of the 20 are making less than $100,000 for the year in compensation, all 18 employees contribute to the plan and each employee is eligible for a $1,250 employer matching contribution. 

Since the tax credit is capped at $1,000 per employee, that credit would be calculated as follows:

$1,000 x 18 Employees = $18,000

The total employer contribution for these 18 employees would be $1,250 x 18 = $22,250 but the company would be eligible to receive a tax credit in year 1 for $18,000 of the $22,250 that was contributed to the plan on behalf of these 18 employees in Year 1.

Note: If an employee only receives a $600 employer match, the tax credit for that employee is only $600. The $1,000 per employee cap only applies to employees that receive an employer contribution in excess of $1,000.

51 to 100 Employees

For companies with 51 – 100 employees, the employer contribution credit calculation is slightly more complex.  Same 5 years phase-down schedule as the 1 – 50 employee companies but the amount of the credit is reduced by 2% for EACH employee over 50 employees.  To determine the amount of the discount you multiply 2% by the number of employees that the company has over 50, and then subtract that amount from the full credit percentage that is available for that plan year.

For example, a new startup 401K has 80 employees, and they are in Year 1 of the 5-year discount schedule, the tax credit would be calculated as follows:

100% - (2% x 30 EEs) = 40%

So instead of receiving a 100% tax credit for the eligible employer contributions for the employees making under $100,000 in compensation, this company would only receive a 40% tax credit for those employer contributions.

Calculation Crossroads

There is a second step in this employer contribution tax credit calculation for companies with 51 – 100 that has the 401(K) industry at a crossroads and will most likely require guidance from the IRS on how to properly calculate the tax credit for these companies when applying the $1,000 per employee cap. 

I’m seeing very reputable TPA firms (third-party administrators) run the second half of this calculation differently based on their interpretation of WHEN to apply the $1,000 per employee cap and it creates different results in the amount of tax credit awarded.

Calculation 1: Some firms are applying the $1,000 per employee cap to the employer contributions BEFORE the discounted tax credit percentage is applied.

Calculation 2: Other firms apply the $1,000 per employee cap AFTER the discounted tax credit is applied to each employee’s employer contribution for purposes of assessing the $1,000 cap per employee.

I’ll show you why this matters in a simple example just using 2 employees:

Sue and Peter both make under $100,000 in compensation and work for Company ABC which has 80 employees.  Company ABC just implemented a 401(K) plan this year with an employer matching contribution, both Sue and Peter contribute to the plan, Sue is entitled to a $1,300 matching contribution and Peter is entitled to a $900 matching contribution.

Since the company has over 80 employees, the company is only entitled to a 40% credit for the eligible employer contribution:

100% - (2% x 30 EEs) = 40%

Calculation 1: If Company ABC applies the $1,000 per employee limit BEFORE applying the 40% credit, Sue’s contribution would be capped at $1,000 and Peter’s contribution would be $900, resulting in a total employer contribution of $1,900. To determine the credit amount:

$1,900 x 40% = $760

Calculation 2:  If Company ABC applies the $1,000 per employee limit AFTER applying the 40% credit:

Sue: $1,300 x 40% = $520

Peter: $900 x 40% = $360

Total Credit = $880

Calculation 2 naturally produces a high tax credit because the credit amount is being applied against Sue’s total employer contribution of $1,300 which is then bringing her contribution in the calculation below the $1,000 per employee limit. 

Which calculation is right? At this point, I have no idea.  We will have to wait and see if we get guidance from the IRS.

Capturing Both Tax Credits In The Same Year

Companies are allowed to claim both the 401(K) Startup Tax Credit and the Employer Contribution Tax Credit in the same plan year.  For example, you could have a company that establishes a new 401(k) plan in 2023, that qualifies for a $4,000 credit to cover plan costs and another $40,000 credit for employer contributions to total $44,000 in tax credits for the year.

Automatic Enrollment Tax Credit

The IRS and DOL are also incentivizing startup and existing 401(K) plans to adopt automatic enrollment in their plan design by offering an additional $500 credit per year for the first 3 years that this feature is included in the plan.  This credit is only available to employers that have no more than 100 employees with at least $5,000 in compensation in the preceding year. The automatic enrollment feature must also meet the eligible automatic contribution arrangement (EACA) requirements to qualify.

For 401(k) plans that started after December 29, 2022, Secure Act 2.0 REQUIRES those plans to adopt an automatic enrollment by 2025.  While a new plan could technically opt out of auto-enrollment in 2023 and 2024, since it’s now going to be required starting in 2025, it might be easier just to include that feature in your new plan and capture the tax credit for the next three years.

Note: Automatic enrollment will not be required in 2025 for plans that were in existence prior to December 30, 2022.

Simple IRA & SEP IRA Tax Credits

Both the Startup Tax Credit and Employer Contribution Tax Credits can also be claimed by companies that sponsor Simple IRAs and SEP IRAs. 

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

529 to Roth IRA Transfers: A New Backdoor Roth Contribution Strategy Is Born

With the passing of the Secure Act 2.0, starting in 2024, owners of 529 accounts will now have the ability to transfer up to $35,000 from their 529 college savings account directly to a Roth IRA for the beneficiary of the account.  While on the surface, this would just seem like a fantastic new option for parents that have money leftover in 529 accounts for their children, it is potentially much more than that.  In creating this new rule, the IRS may have inadvertently opened up a new way for high-income earners to move up to $35,000 into a Roth IRA, creating a new “backdoor Roth IRA contribution” strategy for high-income earners and their family members. 

Money Remaining In the 529 Account for Your Children

I will start by explaining this new 529 to Roth IRA transfer provision using the scenario that it was probably intended for; a parent that owns a 529 account for their children, the kids are done with college, and there is still a balance remaining in the 529 account.

The ability to shift money from a 529 account directly to a Roth IRA for your child is a fantastic new distribution option for balances that may be leftover in these accounts after your child or grandchild has completed college.   Prior to the passage of the Secure Act 2.0, there were only two options for balances remaining in 529 accounts:

1. Change the beneficiary on the account to someone else

2. Process a non-qualified distribution from the account

Both options created potential challenges for the owners of 529 accounts.  For the “change the beneficiary option”, what if you only have one child, or what if the remaining balance is in the youngest child’s account? There may not be anyone else to change the beneficiary to. 

The second option, processing a “non-qualified distribution” from the 529 account, if there were investment earnings in the account, those investment earnings are subject to taxes and a 10% penalty because they were not used to pay a qualified education expense.

The “Roth Transfer Option” not only gives account owners a third attractive option, but it’s so attractive that planners may begin advising clients to purposefully overfund these 529 accounts with the intention of processing these Roth transfers after the child has completed college.

Requirements for 529 to Roth IRA Transfers

Before I get into explaining the advanced tax and wealth accumulation strategies associated with this new 529 distribution option, like any new tax law, there is a list of rules that you have to follow to be eligible to process these 529 to Roth IRA transfers.

The 15 Year Rule

The first requirement is the 529 account must have been in existence for at least 15 years to be eligible to execute a Roth transfer from the account.  The clock starts when you deposit the first dollar into that 529 account.  The planning tip here is to fund the 529 as soon as you can after the child is born, if you do, the 529 account will be eligible for Roth IRA transfers by their 15th or 16th birthday.

There is an unanswered question surrounding rollovers between state plans and this 15-year rule.  Right now, you are allowed to rollover let’s say a Virginia 529 account into a New York 529 account.  The question becomes, since the New York 529 account is a new account, would that end up re-setting the 15-year inception clock?

Contributions Within The Last 5 Years Are Not Eligible

When you go to process a Roth transfer from a 529 account, contributions made to the 529 account within the previous 5 years are not eligible for Roth transfers. 

The Beneficiary of the 529 Account and the Owners of the Roth IRA Must Be The Same Person

A third requirement is the beneficiary listed on the 529 account and the owner of the Roth IRA account must be the same person.   If your daughter is the beneficiary of the 529 account, she would also need to be the owner of the Roth IRA that is receiving the transfer directly from the 529 account.  There is a big question surrounding this requirement that we still need clarification on from the IRS.  The question is this: Is the account owner allowed to change the beneficiary on the 529 account without having to re-satisfy a new 15-year account inception requirement? 

If they allow beneficiary changes without a new 15-year inception period, with 529 accounts, the account owner can change the beneficiary on these accounts to whomever they want……..including themselves.  This would allow a parent to change the beneficiary to themselves on the 529 account and then transfer the balance to their own Roth IRA, which may not be the intent of the new law. We will have to wait for guidance on this.

No Roth IRA Income Limitations

As many people are aware, if you make too much, you are not allowed to contribute to a Roth IRA.  For 2023, the ability to make Roth IRA contributions begins to phase out at the following income levels:

Single Filer:  $138,000

Married Filer: $218,000

These transfers directly from 529 accounts to the beneficiary’s Roth IRA do not carry the income limitation, so regardless of the income level of the 529 account owner or the beneficiary, there a no maximum income limit that would preclude these 529 to Roth IRA transfers from taking place.

The IRA Owner Must Have Earned Income

With exception of the Roth IRA income phaseout rules, the rest of the Roth RIA rules still apply when determining whether or not a 529 to Roth IRA transfer is allowed in a given tax year.  First, the beneficiary of the 529 (also the owner of the Roth IRA) needs to have earned income in the year that the transfer takes place to be eligible to process a transfer from the 529 to their Roth IRA.  

Annual 529 to Roth IRA Transfer Limits

The amount that can be transferred from the 529 to the Roth IRA is also limited each year by the regular Roth IRA annual contribution limits.  For 2023, an individual under the age of 50, is allowed to make a Roth IRA contribution of up to $6,500.   That is the most that can be moved from the 529 account to Roth IRA in a single tax year.  But in addition to this hard dollar limit, you have to also take into account any other Roth IRA contributions that were made to the IRA owner’s account and the IRA owners earned income for that tax year.

The annual contribution limit to a Roth IRA for 2023 is actually the LESSER of:

• $6,500; or

• 100% of the earned income of the account owner

Assuming the IRA contribution limits stay the same in 2024, if a child only has $3,000 in income, the maximum amount that could be transferred from the 529 to the Roth IRA in 2024 is $3,000.

If the child made a contribution of their own to the Roth IRA, that would also count against the amount that is available for the 529 to Roth IRA transfer.  For example, the child makes $10,000 in earned income, making them eligible for the full $6,500 Roth IRA contribution, but if the child contributes $2,000 to their Roth IRA throughout the year, the maximum 529 to Roth IRA transfer would be $4,500 ($6,500 - $2,000 = $4,500)

The IRA limits could be the same or potentially higher in 2024 when this 529 to Roth IRA transfer option goes into effect.

$35,000 Limiting Maximum Per Beneficiary

The maximum lifetime amount that can be transferred from a 529 to a Roth IRA is $35,000 for each beneficiary.  Given the annual contribution limits that we just covered, you would not be allowed to just transfer $35,000 from the 529 to the Roth IRA all in one shot.  The $35,000 lifetime limit would be reached after making multiple years of transfers from the 529 to the Roth IRA over a number of tax years.

Advanced 529 Planning Strategies Using Roth Transfers

Now I’m going to cover some of the advanced tax and wealth accumulation strategies that may be able to be executed under this 529 Roth Transfer provision.  Disclosure, writing this in February 2023, we are still waiting on guidance from the IRS on what they may or may not have intended with this new 529 to Roth transfer option that becomes available starting in 2024, so their guidance could either reinforce that these strategies can be used or limit the use of these advanced strategies. Time will tell.

Super Funding A Roth IRA For Your Child

While 529 accounts have traditionally been used to save exclusively for future college expenses for your children or grandchild, they just become much more than that.   Parents and grandparents can now fund these accounts when a child is young with the pure intention of NOT using the funds for college but rather creating a supercharged Roth IRA as soon as that child begins earning income in their teenage years and into their 20s. 

This is best illustrated in an example.  You have a granddaughter that is born in 2023, you open a 529 account for her and fund it with $15,000.  By the time your granddaughter has reached age 18, let’s assume through wise investment decisions, the account has tripled to $45,000.  Between ages 18 and 21, she works a summer job making $8,000 in earned income each year and then gets a job after graduating college making $80,000 per year.  Assuming she made no contributions to a Roth IRA over the years, you would be able to make transfers between her 529 account and her Roth IRA up to the annual contribution limit until the total transfers reached the $35,000 lifetime maximum. 

If that $35,000 lifetime maximum is reached when she turns age 24, assuming she also makes wise investment decisions and earns 8% per year on her Roth IRA until she reaches age 60, at age 60 she would have $620,000 in that Roth IRA account that could be withdrawal ALL TAX-FREE. 

Now multiply that $620,000 across EACH of your children or grandchildren, and it becomes a truly fantastic way to build tax-free wealth for the next generation.

529 Backdoor Roth Contribution Strategy

A fun fact, there are no age limits on either the owner or beneficiary of a 529 account.  At the age of 40, I could open a 529 account, be the owner and the beneficiary of the account, fund the account with $15,000, wait the 15 years, and then when I turn age 55, begin processing transfers directly from the 529 to my Roth IRA up to the maximum annual IRA limit each year until I reach my $35,000 lifetime limit. 

I really don’t care that the money has to sit in the 529 for 15 years because 529 accumulate tax deferred anyways, and by the time I hit age 59.5, making me eligible for tax-free withdrawal of the earnings, I will have already moved most of the balance over to my Roth IRA. Oh and remember, even if you make too much to contribute directly to a Roth IRA, the income limits do not apply to these 529 to Roth IRA direct transfers.

The IRS may have inadvertently created a new “Backdoor Roth IRA Contribution” strategy for high-income earners.  

Now there may be some limitations that can come into play with the age of the individual executing this strategy, it’s really less about their age, and more about whether or not they will have earned income 15 years from now when the 529 to Roth IRA transfer window opens.  If you are 65, fund a 529, and then at age 80 want to begin these 529 to Roth IRA transfers, if you have no earned income, you can process these 529 to Roth IRA transfers because you are limited by the regular IRA annual contribution limits that require you to have earned income to process the transfers.

Advantage Over Traditional Backdoor Roth Conversions

For individuals that have a solid understanding of how the traditional “Backdoor Roth IRA Contribution” strategy works, the new 529 to Roth IRA transfer strategy potentially contains additional advantages over and above the traditional backdoor Roth strategy. These movements from the 529 to Roth IRA are not considered “conversions”, they are considered direct transfers. Why is that important? Under the traditional Backdoor Roth Contribution strategy the taxpayer is making a non-deductible contribution to a traditional IRA and then processes a conversion to a Roth IRA. 

One of the IRS rules during this conversion process is the “aggregation rule”.  When a Roth conversion is processed, the taxpayer has to aggregate all of their pre-tax IRA balance together in determining how much of the conversion is taxable, so if the taxpayer has other pre-tax IRAs, it came sometimes derail the backdoor Roth contribution strategy.  If they instead use the 529 to Roth IRA direct transfer processes, since as of right now it is not technically a “conversion”, the aggregate rule is avoided.

The second big advantage is with the 529 to Roth IRA transfer strategy, the Roth IRA is potentially being funded with “untaxed earnings” as opposed to after-tax dollar. Again, in the traditional Backdoor Roth Strategy, the taxpayer is using after-tax money to make a nondeductible contribution to a Traditional IRA and then converting those dollars to a Roth IRA. If instead the taxpayer funds a 529 with $15,000 in after-tax dollars, but during the 15-year holding, The account grows the $35,000, they are then able to begin direct transfers from the 529 to the Roth IRA when $20,000 of that account balance represents earnings that were never taxed. Pretty cool!!

State Tax Deduction Clawbacks?

There are some states, like New York, that offer tax deductions for contributions to 529 accounts up to annual limits.  When the federal government changes the rules for 529 accounts, the states do not always follow suit.  For example, when the federal government changed the tax laws allowing account owners to distribute up to $10,000 per year for K – 12 qualified expenses from 529 accounts, some states, like New York, did not follow suit, and did not recognize the new “qualified expenses”.  Thus, if someone in New York distributed $10,000 from a 529 for K – 12 expenses, while they would not have to pay federal tax on the distribution, New York viewed it as a “non-qualified distribution”, not only making the earnings subject to state taxes but also requiring a clawback of any state tax deduction that was taken on the contribution amounts.   

The question becomes will the states recognize these 529 to Roth IRA transfers as “qualified distributions,” or will they be subject to taxes and deduction clawbacks at the state level? Time will tell.  

Waiting for Guidance From The IRS

This new 529 to Roth IRA transfer option that starts in 2024 has the potential to be a tremendous tax-free wealth accumulation strategy for not just children but for individuals of all ages. However, as I mentioned multiple times in the article, we have to wait for formal guidance from the IRS to determine which of these advanced wealth accumulation strategies will be allowed from tax years 2024 and beyond.

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

Mandatory Roth Catch-up Contributions for High Wage Earners - Secure Act 2.0

Starting in 2026, individuals that make over $145,000 in wages will no longer be able to make pre-tax catch-up contributions to their employer-sponsored retirement plan.  Instead, they will be forced to make catch-up contributions in Roth dollars which means that they will no longer receive a tax deduction for those contributions.

This, unfortunately, was not the only change that the IRS made to the catch-up contribution rules with the passing of the Secure Act 2.0 on December 23, 2022.  Other changes will take effect in 2025 to further complicate what historically has been a very simple and straightforward component of saving for retirement.

Even though this change will not take effect until 2026, your wage for 2025 may determine whether or not you will qualify to make pre-tax catch-up contributions in the 2026 tax year.  In addition, high wage earners may implement tax strategies in 2025, knowing that they are going to lose this sizable tax deduction in the 2024 tax year.  

Effective Date Delayed Until 2026

Originally when the Secure Act 2.0 was passed, the Mandatory 401(K) Roth Catch-up was schedule to become effective in 2024. However, in August 2023, the IRS released a formal notice delaying the effective date until 2026. This was most likely a result of 401(k) service providers reaching out to the IRS requesting for the delay so the IRS has more time to provide much need additional guidance on this new rule as well as time for the 401(k) service providers to update their systems to comply with the new rules.

Before Secure Act 2.0

Before the Secure Act 2.0 was passed, the concept of making catch-up contributions to your employer-sponsored retirement account was very easy.  If you were age 50 or older at any time during that tax year, you were able to contribute the maximum employee deferral amount for the year PLUS an additional catch-up contribution.  For 2023, the annual contribution limits for the various types of employer-sponsored retirement plans that have employee deferrals are as follows:

401(k) / 403(b)

EE Deferral Limit:  $22,500

Catch-up Limit:       $7,500

Total                          $30,000

Simple IRA

EE Deferral Limit:  $15,500

Catch-up Limit:       $3,500

Total                          $19,000

You had the option to contribute the full amount, all Pre-tax, all Roth, or any combination of the two.  It was more common for individuals to make their catch-up contributions with pre-tax dollars because normally, taxpayers are in their highest income earning years right before they retire, and they typically prefer to take that income off the table now and pay tax in it in retirement when their income is lower and subject to lower tax rates.

Mandatory Roth Catch-Up Contributions

Beginning in 2026, the catch-up contribution game is going to completely change for high wage earners.  Starting in 2026, if you are age 50 or older, and you made more than $145,000 in WAGES in the PREVIOUS tax year with the SAME employer, you would be forced to make your catch-up contributions in ROTH dollars to your QUALIFIED retirement plan.   I purposefully all capped a number of the words in that sentence, and I will now explain why.

Employees that have “Wages”

This catch-up contribution restriction only applies to individuals that have WAGES over $145,000 in the previous calendar year. Wages meaning W2.  Since many self-employed individuals do not have “wages” (partners or sole proprietors) it would appear that they are not subject to this restriction and will be allowed to continue making pre-tax catch-up contribution regardless of their income.

On the surface, this probably seems unfair because you could have a W2 employee that makes $200,000 and they are forced to make their catch-up contribution to the Roth source but then you have a sole proprietor that also makes $200,000 but they can continue to make their catch-up contributions all pre-tax.  Why would the IRS allow this?

The $145,000 income threshold is based on the individual’s wages in the PREVIOUS calendar year and it’s not uncommon for self-employed individuals to have no idea what their net income will be until their tax return is complete, which might not be until September or October of the following year.   

Wages in the Previous Tax Year

For taxpayers that have wages, they will have to look back at their W2 from the previous calendar year to determine whether or not they will be eligible to make their catch-up contribution in pre-tax dollars for the current calendar year. 

For example, it’s January 2026, Tim is 52 years old, and his W2 wages with his current employer were $160,000 in 2025.  Since Jim’s wages were over the $145,000 threshold in 2025, if he wants to make the catch-up contribution to his retirement account in 2026, he would be forced to make those catch-up contributions to the Roth source in the plan so he would not receive a tax deduction for those contributions.

Wages With The Same Employer

When the Secure Act 2.0 mentions the $145,000 wage limit, it refers to wages in the previous calendar year from the “employer sponsoring the plan”.   So it’s not based on your W2 income with any employer but rather your current employer.  If you made $180,000 in W2 income in 2025 from XYZ Inc. but then you decide to switch jobs to ABC Inc. in 2026, since you did not have any wages from ABC Inc. in 2026, there are no wages with your current employer to assess the $145,000 threshold which would make you eligible to make your catch-up contributions all in pre-tax dollars to ABC Inc. 401(K) plan for 2026 even though your W2 wages with XYZ Inc. were over the $145,000 limit in 2025.

This would also be true for someone that is hired mid-year with a new employer.   For example, Sarah is 54 and was hired by Software Inc. on July 1, 2026, with an annual salary of $180,000.  Since Sarah had no wages from Software Inc. in 2025, she would be eligible to make her catch-up contribution all in pre-tax dollars.  But it gets better for Sarah, she will also be able to make a pre-tax catch-up contribution in 2026 too.  For the 2026 plan year, they look back at Sarah’s 2024 W2 to determine whether or not here wages were over the $145,000 threshold, since she only works for half of the year, her total wages were $90,000, which is below the $145,000 threshold. 

If Sarah continues to work for Software Inc. into 2027, that would be the first year that she would be forced to make her catch-up contribution to the Roth source because she would have had a full year of wages in 2026, equaling $180,000.

$145,000 Wage Limit Indexed for Inflation

There is language in the new tax bill to index the $145,000 wage threshold for inflation meaning after 2024, it will most likely increase that wage threshold by small amount each year. So while I use the $145,000 in many of the examples, the wage threshold may be higher by the time we reach the 2026 effective date.

The Plan Must Allow Roth Contributions

Not all 401(k) plans allow employees to make Roth contributions to their plan.  Roth deferrals are an optional feature that an employer can choose to either offer or not offer to their employees.  However, with this new mandatory Roth catch-up rule for high wage earners, if the plan includes employees that are eligible to make catch-up contributions and who earned over $145,000 in the previous year, if the plan does not allow Roth contributions, it does not just block the high wage earning employees from making catch-up contributions, it blocks ALL employees in the plan from making catch-up contributions regardless of whether an employee made over or under the $145,000 wage threshold in the previous year.

Based on this restriction,  I’m assuming you will see a lot of employer-sponsored qualified retirement plans that currently do not allow Roth contributions to amend their plans to allow these types of contributions starting in 2026 so all of the employees age 50 and older do not get shut out of making catch-up contributions.

Simple IRA Plans: No Mandatory Roth Catch-up

Good news for Simple IRA Plans, this new Roth Catch-up Restriction for high wage earners only applies to “qualified plans” (401(k), 403(b), and 457(b) plans), and Simple IRAs are not considered “qualified plans.”   So employees that are covered by Simple IRA plans can make as much as they want in wages, and they will still be eligible to make catch-up contributions to their Simple IRA, all pre-tax.   

That’s a big win for Simple IRA plans starting in 2026, on top of the fact that the Secure Act 2.0 will also allow employees covered by Simple IRA plans to make Roth Employee Deferrals beginning in 2025.  Prior to the Secure Act 2.0, only pre-tax deferrals were allowed to be made to Simple IRA accounts.  

Roth Contributions

A quick reminder on how Roth contributions work in retirement plans.  Roth contributions are made with AFTER-TAX dollars, meaning you pay income tax on those contributions now, but all the investment returns made within the Roth source are withdrawn tax-free in retirement, as long as you are over the age of 59½, and the contributions have been in your retirement account for at least 5 years. 

For example, you make a $7,000 Roth catch-up contribution today, over the next 10 years, let’s assume that $7,000 grows to $15,000, after reaching age 59½, you can withdraw the full $15,000 tax-free.  This is different from traditional pre-tax contributions, where you take a tax deduction now for the $7,000, but then when you withdraw the $15,000 in retirement, you pay tax on ALL of it.

It’s So Complex Now

One of the most common questions that I receive is, “What is the maximum amount that I can contribute to my employer-sponsored plan?”

Prior to Secure Act 2.0, there were 3 questions to arrive at the answer:

1. What type of plan are you covered by?

2. How old are you?

3. What is your compensation for this year?

Starting in 2024, I will have to ask the following questions:

1.  What type of plan are you covered by?

2. If it’s a qualified plan, do they allow Roth catch-up contributions?

3. How old are you?

4. Are you a W2 employee or self-employed?

5. Did you work for the same employer last year?

6. If yes, what were your total W2 wages last year?

7. What is your compensation/wage for this year? (max 100% of comp EE deferral rule limit)

While this list has become noticeably longer, in 2025, the Secure Act 2.0 will add additional complexity and questions to this list when the “Additional Catch-up Contributions for Ages 60 - 63” go into effect.  We will cover that fun in another article. 

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

Secure Act 2.0: Roth Simple IRA Contributions Beginning in 2023

With the passage of the Secure Act 2.0, for the first time ever, starting in 2023, taxpayers will be allowed to make ROTH contributions to Simple IRAs.  Prior to 2023, only pre-tax contributions were allowed to be made to Simple IRA plans.

Roth Simple IRAs

So what happens when an employee walks in on January 3, 2023, and asks to start making Roth contributions to their Simple IRA?  While the Secure Act 2.0 allows it, the actual ability to make Roth contributions to Simple IRAs may take more time for the following reasons:

1. The custodians that provide Simple IRA accounts to employees may need more time to create updated client agreements to include Roth language

2. Employers may need to decide if they want to allow Roth contributions to their plans and educate their employees on the new options

3. Employers will need to communicate to their payroll providers that there will be a new deduction source in payroll for these Roth contributions

4. Employees may need time to consult with their financial advisor, accountant, or plan representative to determine whether they should be making Roth or Pre-tax Contributions to their Simple IRA.

Mandatory or Optional?

Now that the law has passed, if a company sponsors a Simple IRA plan, are they required to offer the Roth contribution option to their employees? It’s not clear. If the Simple IRA Roth option follows the same path as its 401(k) counterpart, then it would be a voluntary election made by the employer to either allow or not allow Roth contributions to the plan.

For companies that sponsor Simple IRA plans, each year, the company is required to distribute Form 5304-Simple to the employees.  This form provides employees with information on the following:

• Eligibility requirements

• Employer contributions

• Vesting

• Withdrawals and Rollovers

The IRS will most likely have to create an updated Form 5304-Simple for 2023, which includes the new Roth language. If the Roth election is voluntary, then the 5304-Simple form would most likely include a new section where the company that sponsors the plan would select “yes” or “no” to Roth employee deferrals. We will update this article once the answer is known.

Separate Simple IRA Roth Accounts?

Another big question that we have is whether or not employees that elect the Roth Simple IRA contributions will need to set up a separate account to receive them.

In the 401(k) world, plans have recordkeepers that track the various sources of contributions and the investment earnings associated with each source so the Pre-Tax and Roth contributions can be made to the same account.  In the past, Simple IRAs have not required recordkeepers because the Simple IRA account consists of all pre-tax dollars.  

Going forward, employees that elect to begin making Roth contributions to their Simple IRA, they may have to set up two separate accounts, one for their Roth balance and the other for their Pre-tax balance. Otherwise, the plans would need some form of recordkeeping services to keep track of the two separate sources of money within an employee’s Simple IRA account.   

Simple IRA Contribution Limits

For 2023, the annual contribution limit for employee deferrals to a Simple IRA is the LESSER of:

• 100% of compensation; or

• Under Age 50:  $15,500

• Age 50+:  $19,000

These dollar limits are aggregate for all Pre-tax and Roth deferrals; in other words, you can’t contribute $15,500 in pre-tax deferrals and then an additional $15,500 in Roth deferrals.  Similar to 401(k) plans, employees will most likely be able to contribute any combination of Pre-Tax and Roth deferrals up to the annual limit.   For example, an employee under age 50 may be able to contribute $10,000 in pre-tax deferrals and $5,500 in Roth deferral to reach the $15,500 limit.

Employer Roth Contribution Option

The Secure Act 2.0 also included a provision that allows companies to give their employees the option to receive their EMPLOYER contributions in either Pre-tax or Roth dollars. However, this Roth employer contribution option is only available in “qualified retirement plans” such as 401(k), 403(b), and 457(b) plans.  Since a Simple IRA is not a qualified plan, this Roth employer contribution option is not available.

Employee Attraction and Retention

After reading all of this, your first thought might be, what a mess, why would a company voluntarily offer this if it’s such a headache?  The answer: employee attraction and retention.  Most companies have the same problem right now, finding and retaining high-quality employees.  If you can offer a benefit to your employees that your competitors do not, it could mean the difference between a new employee accepting or rejecting your offer.   

The Secure Act 2.0 introduced a long list of new features and changes to employer-sponsored retirement plans. These changes are being implemented in phases over the next few years, with some other big changes starting in 2024.  The introduction of Roth to Simple IRA plans just happens to be the first of many. Companies that take the time to understand these new options and evaluate whether or not they would add value to their employee benefits package will have a competitive advantage when it comes to attracting and retaining employees.

Other Secure Act 2.0 Articles:

• RMD Age Moved to 73 in 2023

• Mandatory Roth Catch-Up Contributions For High Wage Earners

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.

Secure Act 2.0: RMD Start Age Pushed Back to 73 Starting in 2023

On December 23, 2022, Congress passed the Secure Act 2.0, which moved the required minimum distribution (RMD) age from the current age of 72 out to age 73 starting in 2023.  They also went one step further and included in the new law bill an automatic increase in the RMD beginning in 2033, extending the RMD start age to 75.

This is the second time within the past 3 years that Congress has changed the start date for required minimum distributions from IRAs and employer-sponsored retirement plans.  Here is the history and the future timeline of the RMD start dates:

1986 – 2019:     Age 70½

2020 – 2022:     Age 72

2023 – 2032:     Age 73

2033+:               Age 75 

You can also determine your RMD start age based on your birth year:

1950 or Earlier:   RMD starts at age 72

1951 – 1959:      RMD starts at age 73

1960 or later:      RMD starts at age 75   

What Is An RMD?

An RMD is a required minimum distribution.   Once you hit a certain age, the IRS requires you to start taking a distribution each year from your various retirement accounts (IRA, 401(K), 403(b), Simple IRA, etc.) because they want you to begin paying tax on a portion of your tax-deferred assets whether you need them or not. 

What If You Turned Age 72 In 2022?

If you turned age 72 anytime in 2022, the new Secure Act 2.0 does not change the fact that you would have been required to take an RMD for 2022.  This is true even if you decided to delay your first RMD until April 1, 2023, for the 2022 tax year.    

If you are turning 72 in 2023, under the old rules, you would have been required to take an RMD for 2023; under the new rules, you will not have to take your first RMD until 2024, when you turn age 73.

Planning Opportunities

By pushing the RMD start date from age 72 out to 73, and eventually to 75 in 2033, it creates more tax planning opportunities for individuals that do need to take distributions out of their IRAs to supplement this income.  Since these distributions from your retirement account represent taxable income, by delaying that mandatory income could allow individuals the opportunity to process larger Roth conversions during the retirement years, which can be an excellent tax and wealth-building strategy. 

Delaying your RMD can also provide you with the following benefits:

• Reduce the amount of your Medicare premiums

• Reduce the percentage of your social security benefit that is taxed

• Make you eligible for tax credits or deductions that you would have phased out of

• Potentially allow you to realize a 0% tax rate on long-term capital gains

• Continue to keep your pre-tax retirement dollars invested and growing

Additional Secure Act 2.0 Articles

• Mandatory Roth Catch-Up Contributions For High Wage Earners

• New Roth Simple IRA Contributions Beginning in 2023

About Michael……...

Hi, I’m Michael Ruger. I’m the managing partner of Greenbush Financial Group and the creator of the nationally recognized Money Smart Board blog . I created the blog because there are a lot of events in life that require important financial decisions. The goal is to help our readers avoid big financial missteps, discover financial solutions that they were not aware of, and to optimize their financial future.